Posted on 12/12/2017 11:00:58 PM PST by conservative98
Mark Levin
2 HOURS AGO · PUBLIC
You beat Mo Brooks with millions in dishonest ads during the GOP primary because Brooks pledged to vote against you for majority leader. Then you helped Doug Jones in the general election well before the Washington Post story on Roy Moore was published. You didn't get your guy so you sabotaged the process.
To the Uni party.........
and watch everyone of these allegations go away like dust.
Reaganism was the aberration as far as Republicans are concerned, the Republican Party was far more liberal prior to that. They’ve spent all their time and effort since attempting to return to their roots, while hanging onto conservative votes via mere symbolism and window dressing.
The only reason Republicans have looked conservative other than the Reagan era is due to Democrats going full-on Marxist and chasing social conservatives out of the Democrat Party. Republicans hate social conservatives just as much as Democrats do. Any reputed social conservative elected to national office has been compromised in one way or the other and therefore controlled.
We have another anomaly in the Presidency, not such a strong social conservative but he cares about his constituency and does his best to represent our interests. He cannot be controlled and they revile him for that. Roy Moore I believe would have been the same, but he’s not withstood the onslaught of the politics of personal destruction as Trump has. He has a lifetime of refusing to play ball with the power elites, too. They couldn’t have that, threw everything they had and then some at him, and have won this round.
Was Moore the ideal candidate? Ideologically I have little reservation but have to admit that he worried me from the outset. I said all along if he could just run on supporting and furthering the objectives of the Trump administration he’d win in a cakewalk, if he could just stay out of the weeds and keep his mouth shut otherwise.
Guess he didn’t, or couldn’t given what he was confronted with.
Don’t forget to thank Hannity and his in your face interview.
As of last night, you don’t even need to have molested someone. All that needs to happen is to have a willing party step forward and accuse you. What the GOPe doesn;t understand is that their actions in this whole mess are going to open a flood gate of allegations against every non-leftists politician that runs for office. The leftists won with this tactic in AL, and they’ll use it every chance they get in order to destroy their opposition.
It might be interesting to fight fire with fire; hordes of women (and men) accusing the other side, how about 15 in a row jumping up at press conferences and pointing dramatically while accusing? Maybe a kid with a puppy claiming the Democrat kicked it.
Great analogy.
Only the Republican establishment could have orchestrated a loss in Alabama.
You are probably right!
(Recall how Bush 41s had several member’s of his cabinet INDICTED just a week or two before the election of Bill Clinton! AFTER THE ELECTION, the indictments were dropped! There was nothing there! The indictments were used by Clinton/Gore to cause maximum political damage, which they did. After the election, they were dropped!)
NOT for the purpose of running again, but Roy Moore really should pursue each “allegation” legally!
There are important moral and political reasons and lessons as to why!
Voters NEED to see how they were truly manipulated and used.
As a strategy, Roy Moore should begin with those whose “ALLEGATIONS” have already been proven false, creating more and more pressure on the remaining, and take them down like dominos!
None of these 40 year old “allegations” are likely to withstand actual legal pressure!
Then, *AFTER litigating and “legally” blowing up the validity of the near 40 year old “allegations”, Roy Moore CAN GO AFTER THE REAL MEDIA AND POLITICAL PERPS, with defamation and slander related arguments. EVEN IF HE CANNOT WIN! There is underlying importance to do this.
While Roy Moore *may not win lawsuits against the big media and the “outside” establishment which took him down and are now mocking the Alabama voters, by going after the real perps, (*after taking each “accuser” down legally first), it could give him the FREE voice and positive state COVERAGE he needs to demonstrate to Alabama voters how easily DUPED they were, and how easily they were USED like TRAILER PARK PAWNS by the national UNIPARTY and national media!
I have already seen today, Alabama voters are being mocked on liberal/left wing sites across the US!
Interesting, some in the left wing are literally pointing out what we have been saying! Alabama voters were easily manipulated to take out Roy Moore over “alleged” [40 year old] sexual misconduct, and replace him with an openly pro-LGBT and anti-conservative candidate! This has been stated, and the left is laughing at conservative Alabama voters this morning!
Regardless of what one thinks about him, and not for the purposes of running again, Roy Moore needs to continue the fight against evil, and to expose and shed light on what has happened here!
*Conservative voters who have proven nothing more than pawns, and who are now being laughed at nationally, NEED TO KNOW, BE CALLED OUT, AND BE ABLE TO FIGHT AGAISNT THIS IN THE FUTURE!
Listening to Hannity, this I didn’t know until today: in previous elections Moore never did better than 52 percent. This was long before alleged sexual misconduct charges.
He’s never been a truly popular statewide politician. Based on what Hannity had to say, Luther Strange or Mo Brooks would have easily defeated left tard extremist Jones.
Well isn’t that special.......
Only the Republican establishment could have orchestrated a loss in Alabama.
Correct. Moore would have easily won had the GOPe run negative ads against Jones and kept their mouths shut.
Baaaaa! Humbug!!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.