Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: dayglored
I thought that most organizations had decided on Linux for backend servers and Windows for user desktops/laptops.

That's what our organization decided and it seems to be working, however clunkily.

9 posted on 11/13/2017 6:52:08 AM PST by who_would_fardels_bear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: who_would_fardels_bear
> I thought that most organizations had decided on Linux for backend servers and Windows for user desktops/laptops. That's what our organization decided and it seems to be working, however clunkily.

I've worked the last two decades for software development companies. Without exception they all settled on a mix like you describe -- the server farms, network critical machines, and the dev machines, are Linux. The admin front-office folks run Windows on their desktops. The engineering workstations typically run Linux with a Windows VM inside.

But then, if the admin folks demand the big Microsoft-only applications that require Windows servers (Exchange, SharePoint, MS-Dynamics, etc.) then you end up with a hybridized server farm. It can be made to work, but interoperability issues keep the IT folks mighty busy.

12 posted on 11/13/2017 7:41:10 AM PST by dayglored ("Listen. Strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson