Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

How Little-Known "CON" Laws Are Bad For Your Health
http://www.freemarketcentral.com/post/10303/the-free-market-central-interview-how-little-known-con-laws-are-bad-for-your-health-watch ^ | October 2017 | Free Market Central

Posted on 10/25/2017 11:52:44 AM PDT by sloop3

Politicians often insist government is the only way to increase access to health care. In fact, the opposite is true: For years,“certificate of need” laws at the state level have prevented much-needed medical facilities from being built across the country.

(Excerpt) Read more at freemarketcentral.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Health/Medicine; Miscellaneous; Society
KEYWORDS: certificateofneed; cronyism; healthcare; regulation
Perhaps because they're state laws, CON laws were left out of the debate over Obamacare. These toxic regs are hurting people and should be gotten rid of.
1 posted on 10/25/2017 11:52:45 AM PDT by sloop3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: sloop3

CONs are the means where states prohibit competition for their “pals”.


2 posted on 10/25/2017 11:58:19 AM PDT by WKUHilltopper (WKU 2016 Boca Raton Bowl Champions)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WKUHilltopper
CONs are the means where states prohibit competition for their “pals”.

Pals, as in DONORS. It's not that hard to fix. Simply require that ALL political donations be ANONYMOUS. You can't sell influence if you don't know who is buying. Americans should be allowed to donate to any candidate or party they choose, in any amount they wish; that's FREEDOM. But selling and purchasing an outcome is BRIBERY, a CRIME. Lock 'em up!

3 posted on 10/25/2017 12:24:08 PM PDT by JimRed ( TERM LIMITS, NOW! Build the Wall Faster! TRUTH is the new HATE SPEECH.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: sloop3

CON laws of course are primarily designed to protect existing market shares of medical providers. In the past I worked both sides of the fence for my employers. I can help argue for and against the licensing of a tenth MRI machine in a geographical area.


4 posted on 10/25/2017 1:26:33 PM PDT by buckalfa (Slip sliding away towards senility.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: buckalfa

So...tell me some stuff about the “Opioid Crisis” that is rocking America. YOu know, the one where the DEA crawls down the doctors’ throats about over-prescribing narcotics because of the sudden uptick in drug overdoses? The one where most reports don’t bother to separate the legal prescription drug overdoses from the illegal ones? The heroin, fentanyl and laced heroin ODs?

Seems that the CDC has come out with guidelines about who can have what when, CVS has decided they know better than our physicians about what pain we’re in...it sounds like we don’t really need the doctors...we’ll just let the pharmacy diagnose us and give aspirin.

BTW- I’m stage IV met. breast cancer, so the limits won’t apply to me. The drug store may want a note from my mom or husband or God-all in heaven. I don’t even know anyone (since my husband died-not of a drug overdose) who would be immediately impacted. However, I am smart enough (due to past employment) to know that once the good doctors stop handing out the legal stuff, Mr. and Mrs. Middle Class will be driving to the bigger cities and buying their drugs...off the street. THEN we’ll see a real uptake in overdoses. Sorry, this has become my pet peeve...The DEA lost the war on drugs, so now they’re going to open another front, on our average Joe Blow citizens.


5 posted on 10/25/2017 3:06:24 PM PDT by blu (If you don't read the story at the link, don't comment. (Except for Laz...))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: sloop3

I spent more than a decade obtaining CON approvals for a national developer of full service retirement communities and was part of the national health planning process when CON laws were being developed in the mid 1970s. One of the earliest targets of the CON process were CT scanners. At the time CT scanners cost over $1 million and were seen by health planners as expensive hospital “toys” that had little medical need. Fortunately the CT technology became less expensive avoiding CON review thresholds and the life saving benefits were better understood. Had the CON bean counters prevailed there would only be a handful of CT scanners in the US and thousands of patients (including my wife who had a CT scan that detected a large cancer tumor on her kidney) would have died.


6 posted on 10/25/2017 3:55:10 PM PDT by The Great RJ ("Socialists are happy until they run out of other people's money." Margaret Thatcherhttp://www.stone)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson