“I’m not convinced yet that the jury will unanimously buy what the prosecution is selling.”
You are hoping ...
Nope. Not really.
But in addition to yourself being a liar, you're still an idiot, Princess.
My own concerns have not been for those who were most centrally involved -- some of whom I'm fairly certain are possibly guilty (or nearly so) as almost as charged. The conspiracy thingy is still a bit of a stretch...
Rather, my concerns have been for those who were not -- and who likely did not plan on there being any violence, and were not were seeking any. Persons such as Clendennan, and what's that other guy's name? Paul Lasker was it? --the man who was going to the meeting to discuss legislation that was either pending, or else somewhere in the workings within the State Legislature. That man had been involved in those type of affairs for many years, and had valid reason to attend the meeting, but was indicted using identical, one-size-fits-all, fill-in-the-blank-with-a-name template.
That's been the big problem all along. I've only been writing the same things (drawing distinction between various defendants) over, and over, for the last two years. You don't get to tell me, are anyone else what I hope for, or what I think. You aren't even smart enough to read and understand what I put in black and white. You're far too stupid to read my mind, Princess.
I say this not to justify myself to you (because I don't have to) but say what I do so that others here on FR can see what you are. A real jerk. Smarmy. deceitful and not just a little dumb.
Don't post any more of your little comments, Princess. Nobody was talking to you. Nobody wants to. People around here know what you're like. A real sicko (and still all butthurt somebody said something bad about the police).
Grow up, bitch.