Posted on 10/20/2017 12:05:48 PM PDT by drewh
No way these two get married. The Queen has to approve it. In the end he will marry a nice uppercrust English girl.
wasn’t Harry dating the red head for the longest time?
So is she ready to make the changes needed to become a member of the Royal Family? Not that she has said it - but a bratty and selfish: "We're in love and I'm not going to change anything for anyone" would be the exact opposite of what the Royal Family is supposed to represent to the UK.
As you know her, tell us if she can adapt.
Must be a reeeeeely sloooooow snuz day!
They did change the rules to where males are not given preference over females for the throne anymore. Used to be, an older sister was passed over for her younger brother. But now the eldest child, regardless of sex, is next in line for the throne. Not that it will matter for a long time, as the next three in line for the throne happen to be male. But my point is, they changed that rule, so why can’t they change the one saying they can’t skip over Charles?
Not much to look at, she must have some special skills like accounting or something....
Markle makes Koo Stark( of the past) look like a amateur.
Markles acting is amateurish on Suits but her images on
any search engine tell a whole other story- just turn off
your Safe Search option. I don’t think she ever ran into
Harvey Weinstein and his antics and if she did she wouldn’t
divulge that any way as it would jeopardize any future
of matrimony with Pr. Harry. There are other ways to break
into Hollywood and her compromising and lewd images
are there . The RF would NEVER acquiesce , i.e., the Queen
allow marriage of this individual to Pr.Harry.
Were it I had a son I would not give a blessing .
There’s quite a lot of speculation on this matter,
many articles popping up here and there . I am sure
Markle has hired a publicist and tales are being promoted.
But it doesn’t change the matter of her compromised
images. IMHO if she were serious about marriage to
PR.Harry perhaps these images would have been removed;
but they haven’t.
Camilla and Kate wouldn't be the only ones feuding and fighting over their respective choices and champions, LOL. Things could get very ugly.
Since the present Parliament is very much aware of the negative aspects of the idea of skipping-over legitimate heirs to the throne, they will never change this part of the succession protocols.
I applauded the male/female succession change, however....and the Brits accepted it very favorably....except, of course for the resident labourites, socialists, marxists and commies who are ALWAYS conspiring among themselves to bring down forever the noble, historic and fun-to-watch House of Windsor.
Leni
The Royal family had best worry about the Islamification of Great Britain instead of who Harry marries and how she dresses. Full grim-reaper burkas will be in the future of all whose heads don’t end up on pikes.
Elizabeth wouldn’t be queen if her uncle hadn’t abdicated, so Charles could do so. I hope he does.
Leni
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.