Skip to comments.
Louvre Pulls Sculpture, Saying It Was Sexually Explicit
N Y Times ^
| OCT. 2, 2017
| ROBIN POGREBIN
Posted on 10/03/2017 10:58:24 AM PDT by BenLurkin
“This is something that should not happen,” Joep van Lieshout, the collective’s founder, said in a telephone interview. “A museum should be an open place for communication. The task of the museum and the press is to explain the work.”
TOPICS: Arts/Photography; Local News; Society; Weird Stuff
KEYWORDS: bestiality; domestikator; eussr; france; homosexualagenda; horslemurs; louvre; sculpture; sodomandgomorrah; tuileries; vanlieshout; zoophilia
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-45 next last
"The museum also raised concerns about the sculpture, which is 40 feet high, being situated near a children’s playground."
The collective Atelier Van Lieshout’s “Domestikator” (2015), which was to go on view on Oct. 19 in the Louvre’s Tuileries Gardens. Credit Atelier Van Lieshout
1
posted on
10/03/2017 10:58:24 AM PDT
by
BenLurkin
To: BenLurkin
2
posted on
10/03/2017 11:00:42 AM PDT
by
sparklite2
(I'm less interested in the rights I have than the liberties I can take.)
To: BenLurkin
The kids in the playground are gonna pick right up on that.
Just like that planet...you know which one...
To: BenLurkin
Ok. I see it. The artist is a pervert.
To: BenLurkin
It should be titled “Dog Pound”
5
posted on
10/03/2017 11:02:40 AM PDT
by
LostInBayport
(When there are more people riding in the cart than there are pulling it, the cart stops moving...)
To: BenLurkin
To: Sacajaweau
Exposing to kids to man/animal sex.
Talk about getting to them at an early age.
7
posted on
10/03/2017 11:03:23 AM PDT
by
BenLurkin
(The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
To: LostInBayport
To: LostInBayport
It’s title is, “So we can both watch TV.”
9
posted on
10/03/2017 11:04:37 AM PDT
by
sparklite2
(I'm less interested in the rights I have than the liberties I can take.)
To: BenLurkin
I am your Back door man!
10
posted on
10/03/2017 11:05:02 AM PDT
by
Autonomous User
(During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act.)
To: NorthMountain
Is a pervert and wants to use museums to advance perversion.
Sadly, it’s not surprising. In the wake of “gay” marriage, this was foreseen and predicted.
11
posted on
10/03/2017 11:05:10 AM PDT
by
BenLurkin
(The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
To: Autonomous User
"Happily ever after"
12
posted on
10/03/2017 11:06:17 AM PDT
by
BenLurkin
(The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
To: BenLurkin
Gauche, tacky and immature.
To: BenLurkin; NorthMountain
Well, it does look that way. What in the world was the Louvre thinking when they accepted this...oh, wait, I forgot about France’s huge Muslim population.
To them, this is probably kool. Khomeni’s first published writings were an “ask the mullah” column, in which he told a questioner that Islam said it was okay to use a chicken for sex (during which they apparently strangle the chicken) but you shouldn’t eat it afterwards, although you may sell it in the market.
14
posted on
10/03/2017 11:10:46 AM PDT
by
livius
To: Sacajaweau
If it’s kids, that would be Pluto.
15
posted on
10/03/2017 11:12:17 AM PDT
by
sparklite2
(I'm less interested in the rights I have than the liberties I can take.)
To: BenLurkin
How do you know the catcher is a male?
16
posted on
10/03/2017 11:13:25 AM PDT
by
sparklite2
(I'm less interested in the rights I have than the liberties I can take.)
To: sparklite2
It’s an animal. Hence the title “Domesticator”
17
posted on
10/03/2017 11:14:53 AM PDT
by
BenLurkin
(The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
To: BenLurkin
Have they pulled any Koran texts?
Or is it only The Bible they find offensive?
18
posted on
10/03/2017 11:15:27 AM PDT
by
Mr. K
(***THERE IS NO CONSEQUENCE OF REPEALING OBAMACARE THAT IS WORSE THAN OBAMACARE ITSELF***)
To: BenLurkin
and this painting remains in one of the main display halls.... oh, sure, there are tons of theories on its inner meaning behind the British crown... whatever.
To: BenLurkin
Oh, ok, so McCarthy’s “tree sculpture” was just fine?
20
posted on
10/03/2017 11:16:03 AM PDT
by
JohnnyP
(Thinking is hard work (I stole that from Rush).)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-45 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
