Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: fieldmarshaldj; Impy; NFHale

89. A good run. RIP.

The Godfather, Part 2: Probably the greatest (non sci-fi or 007 movie) sequel ever made.


16 posted on 09/12/2017 6:45:28 PM PDT by GOPsterinMA (I'm with Steve McQueen: I live my life for myself and answer to nobody.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: GOPsterinMA

Agreed.


17 posted on 09/12/2017 7:04:12 PM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks (Baseball players, gangsters and musicians are remembered. But journalists are forgotten.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: GOPsterinMA

Yep...the greatest sequel. The only other sequel that can only come close to Godfather II is The Empire Strikes Back...I say that because ESB is the defining movie that made Star Wars what it is today and it was the best of the originals in action and suspense


18 posted on 09/12/2017 7:26:58 PM PDT by Bigtigermike (D)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: GOPsterinMA

In a sense GF II wasn’t a sequel. Rather, it picked up the parts of the GF I novel that weren’t included in the original movie, completing the basic story. GF III was really the sequel and it was horrible compared to the other two.


20 posted on 09/12/2017 7:43:41 PM PDT by libstripper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: GOPsterinMA; fieldmarshaldj; Impy

Yeah, 89 is good...

We get what we get, and that’s all we get. Then its back to dust.

Seems futile and ultimately pathetic, doesn’t it... a lifetime spent learning stuff, figuring things out, working your ass off, and then done. Pfft.


24 posted on 09/12/2017 8:27:42 PM PDT by NFHale (The Second Amendment - By Any Means Necessary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: GOPsterinMA; fieldmarshaldj; NFHale; stephenjohnbanker; sickoflibs; BillyBoy; Bender2
RIP,


25 posted on 09/12/2017 8:44:58 PM PDT by Impy (Anyone who votes to raise taxes deserves to get rabies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: GOPsterinMA

Yes. I also liked the 3 in 1 they put together, except the last half or so of part 3. It was a good story, but Al Pacino as Michael, was a huge disappointment. To say he overdid it, would be an understatement. He seemed to forget his character, all together. Kind of a cross between Groucho Marx and an old George Raft. Very disappointing. If Robert de Niro could play a young Vito, to perfection, whom he looked nothing like, they could have had someone other than Pacino play an old Michael. Michael Nouri, Armand Assante, even Ben Gazzarra, but NOT the now Crazy Al.


29 posted on 09/13/2017 9:12:47 AM PDT by Flaming Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson