Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: dccomix
The ETFO said using Sir John A. Macdonald’s name creates an unsafe environment for kids to learn and work in because Macdonald was a supporter of residential schools back in the 1800’s.

?? So the teacher's union is going back for more than a century to get at someone who was in favor of 'home schooling'! Then again the term of 'residential schools' may be a code term for something different from what it appears.

Otherwise it is hard to find where he has been 'controversial' except for changes in accepted mores over time, ie expansion into native lands, treatment of Qubec armed rebellion etc. If so, then his statues may be in danger up there.

7 posted on 08/24/2017 7:26:44 AM PDT by SES1066 (Happiness is a depressed Washington, DC housing market!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: SES1066

From the Canadian Encyclopedia:

“Residential schools were government-sponsored religious schools established to assimilate Indigenous children into Euro-Canadian culture.”

Quite apart from this issue, Macdonald was a colourful character: an alcoholic, he once publicly vomited in the House of Commons, claiming “It’s not drink that makes me sick but the rantings of my honourable opponent!”.

He later ordered the execution of Louis Riel, the leader of a Metis rebellion against Canadian rule, resigned from office due to the Pacific Scandal (he awarded a lucrative railway contract to a construction company from whom he demanded a large sum of money) and was then re-elected Prime Minister.

In the video accompanying the story he is burned in effigy by protesters!


9 posted on 08/24/2017 7:47:12 AM PDT by dccomix
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: SES1066
"Residential schooling" in this context means boarding schools for Indian children.

The negatives: separated children from their parents, kinship network and culture for extended periods of time, intentionally effaced native languages and the transmission of native cultural and religious traditions.

The positives: separated children from extremely unsafe environments (childhood mortality rates "back home" exceeded 50%), saved children from native cultures which featured extreme cruelty, slavery and misogyny, introduced children into participation in the wider civilization, made their survival and (arguably) their peoples' survival possible.

So, a mixed bag.

Now it is non-PC to refer to it as anything other than "cultural genocide."

16 posted on 08/24/2017 10:22:21 AM PDT by Mrs. Don-o (From the malice of evildoers, defend us, O Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson