...Eric Parker ripped off stand (as he testified in his own defense at Bunkerville trial...BREAKING)

You Tube ^ | 8/10/2017 | JGrady

[Nextrush]

(Speaker at :05)....we're going to start with the Sixth Amendment and there is a good reason why.

'In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial by an impartial jury of the State and district wherin the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for OBTAINING WITNESSES IN HIS FAVOR, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defense'.

Today, today marked a day of the largest most wanton violation of the Sixth Amendment, that is all I have to say.....

(Andrea Parker at :50) So we were upstairs......we were upstairs and Eric Parker was on the stand.....

Marchese (defense attorney) asks him......

The judge herself called a sidebar and Eric Parker (defendant testifying) is whisked from the stand and no longer allowed to testify.

(Judge Navarro quoted) 'There will be no cross examination, there will be no jury questions and court is done for the day'.

(Question) What happened to the jury question we saw passed?

(Andrea Parker) There was one jury question...I can tell you the jurors were shocked and appalled I hope and one juror wrote a question. The judge read it and threw it down and walked out.

I would be surprised if we come back Monday and are allowed to hear Scott Drexler take the stand. (another defendant who wants to testify in his own defense).

I would be surprised she doesn't call this a mistrial first thing Monday morning.

Now I'm going to open this up to everyone behind me because I think we need to have everyone's opinion....

[Nextrush]

The prosecutor and the judge in this case have denied defense witnesses including the defendant himself from testifying in front of the jury in defense of themselves and even then, when the defendant tried to speak using the First and Second Amendments of the Constitution in his testimony, Eric Parker was ripped off the stand in the courtroom.

Other defense witnesses were not even heard by the jury, but the jury was positioned today to hear the testimony that was cut off almost immediately.

Their shock at what they did witness today may impact the verdicts if the trial is the jury is even allowed to go on in that direction.

Observers like Andrea Parker who appears in this video have said Judge Navarro may declare a "mistrial" if it looks like the government is going to lose the case.

This is very important news and deserves the Front Page designation at least.

My attempts to give this story prominence along the Oregon Standoff stories have resulted in my suspension from FR posting numerous times.

What are our priorities here... I would think it would be the Constitutional rights of a defendant as outlined in the Sixth Amendment and his right to use the First and Second Amendment in his own defense?

Its being denied in this courtroom in Nevada, this Kanagaroo Court.

Or are we just here to be suckered into an angry distracting argument between the D's and the R's and the "Left" and the "Right" and the "Trump Lovers" and "Trump Haters"?

What I see in this courtroom in Nevada is:

1. The Harry Reid protégé judge, THE DEMOCRAT PROMOTED JUDGE GLORIA NAVARRO.

2. The Acting US Attorney in Las Vegas, Steven Myrhe, leading the prosecution and being praised by the Attorney General of the United States, THE PROSECUTOR PROMOTED BY REPUBLICAN JEFF SESSIONS.

BOTH OF THE UNIPARTIES HAVE PROMOTED THIS TRAVESTY OF A TRIAL GOING ON IN NEVADA RIGHT NOW WHERE THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES IS SOMETHING THE PROSECUTOR AND THE JUDGE WIPE THEIR HINEYS WITH.

[Lurkinanloomin]

We left the Constitution behind on Usurpation Day, January 20, 2009 when BOTH parties decided to ignore Art II sec 1 and allow into office a man who admitted he was born a British subject.

[Baynative]

For those who are interested, and that should include everyone, REDOUBT NEWS has had people on site and at the trial covering every bit of this American tragedy going all the way back to the first stand off.

[lysie]

For later.

[exit82]

We left the Constituion in the dust on Feb. 12, 1999, when the Senate failed to remove Clinton as President for felonies he committed.

It has been a slow steady slide downward from there.

18.5 years and counting.

[LegendHasIt]

I’ve got the video bookmarked for when I have some bandwidth available....

But ya know.... I’m starting to get a little miffed at this kangaroo court and black robed judiciarch.

And the U. S. ‘Justice’ Department that allows it. It is almost like 0bama was still pResident, or Hillary had won.

[Nextrush]

Good for them and I have seen some of their coverage but this needs “mainstreaming”.

I worked as a news broadcaster at a religious station in the 1980’s to promote the resistance to state control of schools in Nebraska run by churches.

The story was given “crisis” attention with special reports and cut ins.

It was done like it mattered, done like Ed Murrow did World War II on CBS Radio way back when.

Eventually the religious subculture and Evangelical Christians who then were working at “USA Today” and ABC News got the story the national attention it deserved.

Fox News should give this some wall to wall attention, but no the ‘he said, she said’ of political debates featuring women’s legs and bosoms must come first.

I don’t know what that OAN News outfit is doing, I don’t watch it, but again the opportunity for a wall to wall franchise like Ted Koppel built with “Nightline” doing the Iran Hostages back in 1979.

[Rusty0604]

Thanks for posting. Don’t know why this issue is not allowed on FR except for maybe at one time Trump sided with the government. I was hoping that at the time he wasn’t aware of all the facts of the case. Hard to believe this kind of stuff can go on in court.

[House Atreides]

Jeff Sessions clearance doesn’t have the GUTS to rein in the DEEP STATER PROSECUTORS within HIS DOJ. As I recall, SESSIONS PRAISED THIS PERSECUTION.

[Bobalu]

President Trump, Tear down this kangaroo court! Issue pardons to these abused defendants.

[Sasparilla]

....The judge herself called a sidebar and Eric Parker (defendant testifying) is whisked from the stand and no longer allowed to testify...

WTH is going on here? A defendant has a right to assist in his defense and a right to testify in his defense.

[Strac6]

When did Mr. Obama admit he was a British subject?

[Romans Nine]

Are you fimilar with the Bible Baptist Church in Columbus Nebraska?

[Lurkinanloomin]

On his website prior to his election.

[Nextrush]

The conflict at the end of the 1970’s and early 1980’s focused on Faith Baptist Church in Lousiville, Nebraska (Cass County) due south of the Omaha area.

I am not familiar with the church you mention.

[PAR35]

>>>>Are you fimilar with the Bible Baptist Church in Columbus Nebraska?<<<<

Interesting read.
https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/1798421/state-v-swiney/

How did this one turn out?

http://columbustelegram.com/city-pastor-faces-suit-after-alleged-assault/article_ebb879a8-a14e-5b59-8e47-f4e301aaa773.html

[Nextrush]

I laid things out with Sessions whole quote included to show how this all hurts President Trump with grassroots supporters in a blog post last month.

http://nextrushfree.blogspot.com/2017/07/jeff-sessions-salute-of-constitution.html

Frankly when one brings in the Mueller Inquisition-middle of the night raids on top of this Bunkerville matter, its obvious that the Department of Justice and the FBI are enemies of the POTUS because of Sessions leadership or lack of it.

[PAR35]

You have to read post 1 in connection with the main story, and then remember the history of the case. “when the defendant tried to speak using the First and Second Amendments of the Constitution in his testimony”

The judge had previously ruled no first or second amendment testimony (and that has been preserved for appeal.)

It appears that the witness went into the area prohibited with his testimony (that’s at least a fair reading of the first post, although it is omitted from the main story). In which case the judge could be expected to cut things off. Generally, one would expect the judge to offer an instruction to the jury at that point. Unless she plans to order a mistrial and start over from scratch. It may well support a finding of willful contempt if it went down like it appears above.

[House Atreides]

Good write-up. I’m beginning to think that Sessions is believing whatever lies his Deep State & Obama holdovers staff feed him. He’s isolated on a daily basis and surrounded by a bubble of DOJ progressives. Sessions is forgetting that he has a mind of his own and that his obligation is to the Constitution and the American People; his obligation is not to his inherited and pre-positioned leftist staff.

[Thud]

I haven't paid any attention to this until now, and have no idea what is going on, but this part from the original post is real interesting (my emphasis):

"(Judge Navarro quoted) 'There will be no cross examination, there will be no jury questions and court is done for the day'.

(Question) What happened to the jury question we saw passed?

(Andrea Parker) There was one jury question...I can tell you the jurors were shocked and appalled I hope and one juror wrote a question. The judge read it and threw it down and walked out."