[rbg81]

Is this an anonymous source? Why did this not come out earlier?

[Voluntaryist]

Officials emphasized that the information contradicting Sessions comes from U.S. intelligence on Kislyak’s communications with the Kremlin, and acknowledged that the Russian ambassador could have mischaracterized or exaggerated the nature of his interactions.
“Obviously I cannot comment on the reliability of what anonymous sources describe in a wholly uncorroborated intelligence intercept that the Washington Post has not seen and that has not been provided to me,” said Sarah Isgur Flores, a Justice Department spokeswoman in a statement. She reiterated that Sessions did not discuss interference in the election.

[Sacajaweau]

Yes it is. It’s called creative writing. You have to read the entire article to pick out the one big flaw in it....

[dforest]

If it came from Intel, it was a leak to the WaPo.