uh, pretty much, yeah.
Muhammed preached salvation outside of Christ.
That’s the definition of both a false prophet and an anti-Christ.
Mohammed made the walking lame.
Jesus made the blind see.
Mohammed made the seeing blind.
Jesus made the dead live.
Mohammed made the living, dead.
Jesus when he died took his body into heaven to sit at the right-hand of God
Mohammed, don't know where he is.
The second greatest prophet of Allah (after Muhammad).
I could add more mythological details of the Muhammadan version of Jesus, but that's the main point.
Who is a liar but he that denieth that Jesus is the Christ? He is antichrist, that denieth the Father and the Son.That would fit under the definition of “antichrist” right there.
—1 John 2:22
And say: Praise be to Allah, Who hath not taken unto Himself a son, and Who hath no partner in the Sovereignty, nor hath He any protecting friend through dependence. And magnify Him with all magnificence.
— Surah 17:11 and others
Islam is an outpouring of the spirit of antichrist, and has been since the onset. In this it is one of a class of beliefs distinct from other false religions that do not profit their adherents which had their start in times and place where the Gospel was not yet known (and which may even have their starts without reference to the Law as well). Islam is inherently, simply, explicitly a rejection of Christ and his Gospel.
It is another “gospel” which is not a gospel at all.
Christ told Pilate that his kingdom was not of this world and that is why his disciples were not fighting. By contrast Mohammad’s followers went out killing, looting and raping as soon as they had enough strength to do so ... which should tell you something about Allah’s kingdom....
Jesus was the son of God who lived the perfect life and offers us salvation.
Mad mo was a warlord, slave trader, sex slave trafficer, mass murderer, liar, thief, pedophile, rapist and didn’t like dogs. And he admitted he didn’t even know if he was going to heaven.
No comparison.
The darkness can not stand the light.
My thoughts....Freegards,,,
Jesus saved his followers, Mohammad killed them...
Mohammed felt the need to demote Jesus to “just another prophet”, and therefore all the writers of the New Testament are liars. The very purpose for his invented religion is to compete in an antagonistic way against Christians and Jews to gain worldly power.
Yes and yes.
muhommed (piss be unto him) said that Christ was at best a prophet not the Son of God.
Then that same pedophile Satan worshiper proceeded to create the most evil, savage and hateful ideology in the history of mankind.
Liberals and Islam:
Both antichrist.
Islam is a “MADE UP”, BOGUS, religion. There is no Allah, he was made up by the murdering pedophile Mohammed.
Don’t even make a comparison between Islam and Christianity. There is NONE. Islam is the Kwanzaa of religion.
Be INFORMED!
Yes and yes
Why the question?
Somewhere in my piles of books is one from 1920’s Britain where a number of doctors were given the details of Muhammad’s death without being told who they were diagnosing. They said it was a STD.
Jesus says “he who has no sin shall cast the first stone”, so none did.
Mohammed says “punishment for adultery is stoning”.
Jesus only asks that you follow him.
Mohammed says to “smite the necks of the unbelievers where you find them”.
You can lose faith in Christ and leave the Church.
Leaving Islam is punishable by death. <— which is what makes Islam a cult, not a religion.
They’re both providing an “ethics system”, it’s just that they’re polar opposites. Which is why Europe is committing cultural suicide by letting so many in so quickly, their culture has had the fabric of their society woven by Judeo-Christian ethics which will be violently unraveled. One ethics system promotes life, prosperity, and joy. The other brings death, poverty, and despair.
Satan’s goal is certainly to impose one of these. It’s also the problem atheists don’t know they have, they believe they can be “a good person” without God. That’s overly simplistic, their very idea of what defines “good” is predetermined by the culture with which they grew up in. Muslims see “good” in a *very* different light. Atheists want the Ten Commandments taken out of the public sphere but really, which one of the ideals do they disagree with? They don’t, but this collection of ideas with a title “Ten Commandments” is, apparently to them, unconstitutional. I’ve asked atheists which one of the Ten Commandments they disagree with, I’ve never had an answer.
If I were to right the Ten Commandments for Muslims it would look like:
Thou shalt not murder, so long as they’re Muslim.
Thou shalt not bear false witness, unless they’re not Muslim.
Thou shalt not steal, from other Muslims.
...
Our problem is that so long as this compare/contrast of ethics systems isn’t seen as necessary, or even considered, our politicians will treat them equally due to wanting more votes. Christianity is compatible with liberty, Islam comes with a system of law that crushes it.
Evil vs. Good. Satan vs. Christ.
Does a bear...Is the Pope...oh, never mind.