Still unclear if he actually received anything. Fragments I’m putting together indicate he dropped contact & walked out when he realized where it was going, before it got there.
And NOBODY, oddly, is asking WTF this lawyer had on Hillary.
They're not asking this question because it presents them with an inescapable dilemma:
1. If the lawyer had nothing on Hillary Clinton, then the "collusion" nonsense disappears ... and it really was just a meeting about Russian adoptions.
2. If the lawyer did have incriminating evidence against Hillary Clinton, then that itself makes her: (A) unfit to serve as president by any measure (she'd clearly be exposed to blackmail if elected); and (B) the person who should immediately become the focus of any investigation related to the 2016 election.
.
She had nothing on Hillary that wasn’t common knowledge. She was just scamming Trump in hopes of getting rich.
.