1 posted on
07/10/2017 11:26:47 AM PDT by
Morgana
To: Morgana
All it is is saving face. They don’t care about the baby.
2 posted on
07/10/2017 11:27:53 AM PDT by
bgill
(CDC site, "We don't know how people are infected with Ebola.")
To: Morgana
YES!! Praise God!!
More POTUS Winning!!
3 posted on
07/10/2017 11:29:30 AM PDT by
Jane Long
(Praise God, from whom ALL blessings flow.)
To: Morgana
They will even allow this baby, with his very rare genetic condition, known as mitochondrial DNA depletion syndrome, to be treated with an experimental therapy offered freely from the United States. Except both Britain's and the EeeeeU's highest court have already ruled that they can't.
5 posted on
07/10/2017 11:29:45 AM PDT by
TBP
(0bama lies, Granny dies.)
To: Morgana
So is he coming to the US?
To: Morgana
The people making these decisions all have addresses.
All of them.
L
14 posted on
07/10/2017 12:07:18 PM PDT by
Lurker
(America burned the witch.)
To: Morgana
Treating that child under the NHS in Great Ormond Street Hospital with experimental treatment from the US creates a perverse incentive for the hospital to still allow him to die. It proves them right.
Get him out of there.
To: Morgana
16 posted on
07/10/2017 12:14:32 PM PDT by
Georgia Girl 2
(The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped)
To: Morgana
A slight correction to the headline. The hospital decided "against being known as 'that killer hospital'". Nothing has changed in the people or the process responsible for pulling the plug on the patient. The only thing that has, is the publicity.
To: Morgana
This is like back in the 1800s when Utah wanted to become a state, and the LDS bishops suddenly had a brand new revelation that polygamy was wrong.
20 posted on
07/10/2017 3:05:20 PM PDT by
Albion Wilde
(I was not elected to continue a failed system. I was elected to change it. --Donald J. Trump)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson