It doesn’t appear that money is a factor in this case. It is possible that Charlie is too unstable to move, meaning that even with a portable vent and medical staff to transport him, that he would most likely die from being moved. Without being on his medical team that is impossible to know. It is the only reason I can come up with for them ( the hospital to not allow it)
From another article, a group of specialists had determined that the experimental treatment would not be effective and the court followed that determination.
My question is, how would they know? The doctors who are offering the experimental treatment do not know whether it will work or not that is why it is called experimental.
I think it boils down to state control freakism. They wouldn’t even let the parents take their child home to die. Total state control freakism.
I hope and pray that Charlie gets a chance to live and grows up to tell the EU/UK courts to stuff it.
Moving Charlie is difficult but he’ll be out of that hospital and in God’s hands. Leaving him to languish longer is insane.