To: nicollo; Kalam; IYAS9YAS; laplata; mvonfr; Southside_Chicago_Republican; celmak; SvenMagnussen; ...
If anybody wants on/off the revolutionary progressivism ping list, send me a message
Progressives do not want to discuss their own history. I want to discuss their history.
Summary: With progressives, there are no coincidences.
2 posted on
06/24/2017 9:24:49 AM PDT by
ProgressingAmerica
(We cannot leave history to "the historians" anymore.)
To: ProgressingAmerica
If he did, he obviously didn’t understand them.
4 posted on
06/24/2017 9:38:53 AM PDT by
TBP
(0bama lies, Granny dies.)
To: ProgressingAmerica
Karl Marx read Adam Smith’s works in order to deconstruct capitalism, so Wilson could very well have read James Wilson in the very same way.
5 posted on
06/24/2017 9:39:55 AM PDT by
Slyfox
(Where's Reagan when we need him? Look in the mirror - the spirit of The Gipper lives within you.)
To: ProgressingAmerica
Wilson’s verbiage is smoke and mirrors, intended to obscure the agenda: doing away with self-government.
Every approach to the law other than Originalism is an attack on the ability of the people to be governed by laws they have made.
10 posted on
06/24/2017 10:49:25 AM PDT by
Arthur McGowan
(https://youtu.be/IYUYya6bPGw)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson