MISTRIAL!
DA has already announced he will re-try the case.
1 posted on
06/17/2017 7:58:02 AM PDT by
Enchante
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-25 next last
To: Enchante
DA has already announced he will re-try the case.It will be impossible to find and empanel an impartial jury now, since everyone who was not on the jury knows all the publicity surrounding the case.
2 posted on
06/17/2017 8:01:11 AM PDT by
chajin
("There is no other name under heaven given among people by which we must be saved." Acts 4:12)
To: All
Cosby is a scumbag but the case was infected with “reasonable doubt”.... although there doesn’t seem to be any real doubt about what he was doing. Administering Qualudes to women to make them pliable and controllable for sex. I would have voted to convict, for sure, but I can see how someone would keep arguing reasonable doubt.
3 posted on
06/17/2017 8:01:23 AM PDT by
Enchante
(Searching throughout the country for one honest Democrat....)
To: Enchante
Enchante wrote:
MISTRIAL!
DA has already announced he will re-try the case.
I believe he should be brought to trial again.
4 posted on
06/17/2017 8:02:26 AM PDT by
heterosupremacist
(Domine Iesu Christe, Filius Dei, miserere me peccatorem!)
To: Enchante
Told ya all . . . those white jurors proved to the world that they are not racisses - and they would vote for Barry if they onlyest could.
6 posted on
06/17/2017 8:04:56 AM PDT by
Pilgrim's Progress
(http://www.baptistbiblebelievers.com/BYTOPICS/tabid/335/Default.aspx D)
To: Enchante
Well, his lawyer did what he was paid to do. (Grrrr!)
Next!
9 posted on
06/17/2017 8:09:23 AM PDT by
Diana in Wisconsin
(I don't have 'Hobbies.' I'm developing a robust Post-Apocalyptic skill set!)
To: Enchante
No jury with a single black member will ever convict ‘America’s (rapist) Dad’. Retry and force him to sit in a courtroom for the rest of his natural life.
15 posted on
06/17/2017 8:17:52 AM PDT by
Godebert
(CRUZ: Born in a foreign land to a foreign father.)
To: Enchante
16 posted on
06/17/2017 8:19:24 AM PDT by
trisham
(Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
To: Enchante
Any word on the jury split between guilty and not guilty?
17 posted on
06/17/2017 8:23:12 AM PDT by
NautiNurse
(Tear down the Mexican Carrier plant and use the materials to build the wall)
To: Enchante
Would LUV to know how the 12-Person Jury vote of Guilty vs. Acquittal was based on race and gender!
Thinking OJ Trial here!
18 posted on
06/17/2017 8:26:28 AM PDT by
TRY ONE
(I never got the memo changing the name of Global Warming to Klimate Change)
To: Enchante
I have not followed this closely, but isn’t it based on allegations from 40 years ago? That for me would be enough to acquit. Is Gloria Allred’s daughter one of the lawyers? Or some DA trying to make a name for himself?? If I had been on the jury and the judge kept sending it back until we reached a verdict, I would have held out for aquittal even more. I didn’t like that the judge did that. imho.
24 posted on
06/17/2017 8:41:54 AM PDT by
bboop
(does not suffer fools gladly)
To: Enchante
What did the cook say when the rat fell into the chowder?
"Better luck next time."
25 posted on
06/17/2017 8:43:01 AM PDT by
dainbramaged
(Get out of my country now)
To: Enchante
Bad headline. The case is not finished...maybe.
I want to know what the final count was. If it was mostly for not guilty I don’t see how prosecutor can justify moving forward
26 posted on
06/17/2017 8:46:17 AM PDT by
Nifster
(I see puppy dogs in the cloudslo)
To: Enchante
I don’t want to sound catty, but... I’m watching the prosecutor’s news conference. Who on earth is that girl to his right?
If you’re going to be on TV, for pity’s sake comb your hair. She looks like she just rolled out of bed.
30 posted on
06/17/2017 8:54:11 AM PDT by
Not A Snowbird
(Almost a year in Arizona... and I haven't burst into flames yet.)
To: Enchante
Anyone know what the jury split was guilty/not
34 posted on
06/17/2017 9:05:53 AM PDT by
BigEdLB
(To Dimwitocrats: We won. You lost. Get used to it.)
To: Enchante
he will likely only retry IF he can introduce more cases to show a pattern of serial assault- otherwise he may not try it again especially if he finds out that most of the jurors were against conviction and only one or 2 were for it- that will likely determine whether he actually goes forward or not- As DA- He basically had to say he was going to retry- many state that only to later say that ‘new info determined it would not be worth retrying’
36 posted on
06/17/2017 9:14:50 AM PDT by
Bob434
To: Enchante
38 posted on
06/17/2017 9:17:37 AM PDT by
Bon mots
(Laughing at liberal tears!)
To: Enchante
Typical propaganda by the lyin' media. The CASE has not ended, just the first trial, which was declared a mistrial.
This pervert is not off the hook by a long shot.
46 posted on
06/17/2017 9:54:56 AM PDT by
jimbug
To: Enchante
Was a breakdown of guilty vs not guilty ever officially announced...or revealed by any of the jurors?
To: Enchante
Didn't I hear that there are 60 women who claim to be his victims?
60? Holy Moly, if half are lying......he's still in big trouble, eh?
50 posted on
06/17/2017 10:10:29 AM PDT by
blam
To: Enchante
Ah, that is ok. It prolongs his misery and gets retried anyway.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-25 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson