Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

In one graph, why the #ParisAgreement is useless
Watts Up With That ^ | May 31, 2017 | Anthony Watts

Posted on 06/01/2017 6:55:05 PM PDT by Vince Ferrer



TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: bloggers; climate; fakescience; paris; parisaccord; parisagreement
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-67 next last
Its better to visit the link because there are a lot of tweets that I don't know how to post, but the chart reveals that if we stayed in the agreement, all the trillions that we would spend would affect the climate less than the margin of error of the range of predicted temperature change. The president is correct, we can use those trillions to better purpose curing disease, fighting pollution, growing the economy, or just about anything else.
1 posted on 06/01/2017 6:55:05 PM PDT by Vince Ferrer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Vince Ferrer

Good post. Thanks for the info.


2 posted on 06/01/2017 6:57:55 PM PDT by Inyo-Mono
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vince Ferrer

Well done, President Trump. After the latest decision against the climate change racket, the successful strike on the Syrian air base and the other successful action against Iranian troops advancing toward a U.S. position in Syria, he’s at least three points up here.


3 posted on 06/01/2017 7:01:15 PM PDT by familyop ("Welcome to Costco. I love you." --Costco greeter in the movie, "Idiocracy")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vince Ferrer

And this is assuming that they will “do all Paris promises every year.”

Heh.

You can bet everything you have that at least ninety-five percent of this money will go into the pockets of politicians, weather mongers, Banana Republican dictators, and all the rest of the usual suspects.


4 posted on 06/01/2017 7:03:56 PM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vince Ferrer

Unmeasurable outside the margin of error.


5 posted on 06/01/2017 7:06:19 PM PDT by rfp1234 (DinosorosExtinction)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vince Ferrer; caww

I liked his comment that at the end, the United States would still have the cleanest air, water, rivers, and lakes.

Our businesses are now very clean

We’ll be the cleanest, and they’ll still be complaining about us.

Trump didn’t miss track today. I don’t think a single one of us could have done a better job than he did there representing our stance on these issues.

What a day!

So..., freakin..., much..., WINNING!


6 posted on 06/01/2017 7:06:21 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (May the Covfefe be with you...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vince Ferrer

And that’s just an estimation. A pretty long-range estimation.


7 posted on 06/01/2017 7:08:23 PM PDT by meyer (The Constitution says what it says, and it doesn't say what it doesn't say.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vince Ferrer

Bump


8 posted on 06/01/2017 7:10:37 PM PDT by Sans-Culotte (Time to get the US out of the UN and the UN out of the US!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vince Ferrer; BenLurkin

Even the worse case scenarios forecast only a mere 1.3 degrees warmer for a doubling of CO2. This benefit (longer growing seasons, fewer deaths in winter from freezing and cold, less heating bills - assuming it does warm at all! - is entirely beneficial.

And then the CAGW alarmists “project” this 1.3 degree warming by amplifying the CO2 effect with water vapor to “predict” 4 degrees warmer in 100 years (year 2100). But the alarmists headlines take this “potential” +4 degrees warming, and write as if FUTURE TEMPERATURES were actually going to be +10 or +15 degrees hotter!

Now, understand that 17 of those 100 years towards 2100 have already passed. But there is (now) ONLY a measured 0.3 degrees increase since 1973!

SO,

We are supposed to suddenly increase another 3.7 degrees (NOT 3.6 percent!) in 87 years when we have increased 0.3 degrees in the past 40 years ?????

And a even 3.7 degree increase will not kill anyone.

By the way, some 1.2 billion people are being fed by the 12% - 23% INCREASE in food grown each year BECAUSE of the increased OC2 in the atmosphere.

And another 4 billion people are being FED annually by the fossil fuels driving tractors, trucks, reapers, harvesters, combines, processing plants, storage and handling facilities, factories, fertilizer plants, trains, ships and coal-fired power plants worldwide.


9 posted on 06/01/2017 7:11:20 PM PDT by Robert A Cook PE (I can only donate monthly, but socialists' ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vince Ferrer

And yet the whine chorus has begun from the likes of the corporate CEO crowd, a la Jeff Immelt of GE, that this is just unconscionable. We all know where their loyalty is, right???


10 posted on 06/01/2017 7:11:24 PM PDT by T-Bird45 (It feels like the seventies, and it shouldn't.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

That’s right......his speech was spot on and he didn’t leave a stone un-turned.......I especially liked the fact he speaks clearly so that all Americans can understand......too many politicians proudly talk over peoples heads not realizing people just want to be told how it is and they will decide how they see it.


11 posted on 06/01/2017 7:15:13 PM PDT by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: meyer

The trend could just as easily be downward by that time. A lot of this is cyclic, and there are a number of different cycles acting at the same time.


12 posted on 06/01/2017 7:15:48 PM PDT by meyer (The Constitution says what it says, and it doesn't say what it doesn't say.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: caww

Yes. I agree with your comments as well.


13 posted on 06/01/2017 7:16:57 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (May the Covfefe be with you...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: T-Bird45

GE sells windmills, and gets a nice government subsidy to do so.


14 posted on 06/01/2017 7:17:44 PM PDT by meyer (The Constitution says what it says, and it doesn't say what it doesn't say.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Vince Ferrer

Well it’s obviously never been about the climate or changes of.....rather a gigantic hoax for Americans to foot the bill of the Globalist Agenda for re-population and redistribution of wealth.....which would equal:

All the elites as rich and in control of the world and everyone else poor and serving their interests.

They sure aren’t building these ultra modern cities world wide for the average citizen on the street.


15 posted on 06/01/2017 7:19:49 PM PDT by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: T-Bird45
And yet the whine chorus has begun from the likes of the corporate CEO crowd, a la Jeff Immelt of GE, that this is just unconscionable. We all know where their loyalty is, right???

Follow the money. For example, Elon Musk. Two of his three businesses he started ten years ago, Tesla and SolarCity, game the system of environmental giveaways. He would stand to benefit from more environmental giveaways. Because of this, he has withdrawn from the president's business committee. There are going to be a lot of winners and losers from this move.

16 posted on 06/01/2017 7:20:05 PM PDT by Vince Ferrer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

We’re already the cleanest. China and India and the rest, not so much. Which makes sense, since that’s where the factories went.


17 posted on 06/01/2017 7:20:18 PM PDT by Wolfie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ExSoldier

Ping.


18 posted on 06/01/2017 7:20:25 PM PDT by DuncanWaring (The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vince Ferrer

User friendly

19 posted on 06/01/2017 7:20:31 PM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vince Ferrer

Trump’s speech today was nothing short of BRILLIANT. Definitely powerful enough to convert some believers of the Climate Change SCAM.


20 posted on 06/01/2017 7:21:07 PM PDT by CivilWarBrewing (Feminism DESTROYED females)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-67 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson