Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: NEMDF

the allegation is that weeds grew more than 8” high.

the alleged weeds were cut down within a 2-3 weeks.

then a notice of continued violation was received.

basically the city seems to want to use a 12 year old weed ordinance to force property owners to replace lawns with some sort of drought resistant landscaping, at a cost of $2k+. the city offers up to $1k in compensation.

city can levy fines up to $100/day.

objections to the bureacrat mgr were all dismissed. threats of fines continue.


8 posted on 05/23/2017 9:23:15 AM PDT by SteveH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: SteveH
basically the city seems to want to use a 12 year old weed ordinance to force property owners to replace lawns with some sort of drought resistant landscaping...

I knew which state as soon as I read that.

10 posted on 05/23/2017 9:28:36 AM PDT by Mr.Unique (The government, by its very nature, cannot give except what it first takes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson