So the lack of evidence is evidence that for which there is no evidence can only be refuted by the presentation of evidence?
There is sufficient evidence to create a rebuttable presumption of a racial motive in the selection of the victims. Mere statements by officials that we should ignore our lying eyes and believe them of faith should be greeted with the contempt that it deserves.
Do you also believe the government when they yell “Not terrorism related” before the evidence has even been gathered? If so, are you interested in a great deal on some beachfront property in Nevada or investing in a tropical resort on the Bering Sea?