What you’re missing is that the American people in general always support military action taken by a a president.
We really can’t run the country based on your suspicions based on who supported an action. This was a limited action and it served multiple purposes.
If you want Lindsey Graham and others to always oppose every Trump policy, we are going to have a lot of trouble governing.
You should be glad that this particular action drew their support and will have the ultimate effect of shutting them up about Russia.
“What you’re missing is that the American people in general always support military action taken by a a president.”
Yes, like in Vietnam, like in Central America in the 80s. like in Iraq. Democrats are well known for their support of the military. /s
Exactly. Either we trust this President or we don't.
Many of those—not all, but many—who are wringing their hands right now are the same crowd who have never been willing to give President Trump the benefit of the doubt.
For some, it's just another excuse to indulge their NeverTrump impulses.
At some point, the endless second-guessing of every single move has to stop. We have the hysterical Left for that.
This man set aside his easy life in order to try to Make America Great Again, and tearing him down at every opportunity will never help him succeed.
I'm not privy to the classified intel which the President based his decision on, but I do know that it was backed up by multiple sources, including Israel. There certainly seemed to be a consensus among the relevant interests.
This very limited action accomplished several things, among them is the total evaporation of the absurd notion that President Trump was being influenced by Russia.
I defer to the President's judgement—and that of his Defense Secretary, Cabinet, and advisors—on this matter of foreign policy. Period.