To: MarvinStinson
The article pretends she has some case because someone was once charged for killing an armed robber in NC.
Unfortunately the person charged in the case cited was not charged for defending himself, but for illegal possession of a firearm as a felon.
16 posted on
04/09/2017 11:53:44 AM PDT by
FredZarguna
(And what Rough Beast, its hour come round at last, slouches toward Fifth Avenue to be born?)
To: FredZarguna
Go ahead and fire him. Then do a Go Fund Me campaign for the worker. Once the fund hits 2x his yearly salary give the leftover money to the next stand your ground type. 2 year vacation.
26 posted on
04/09/2017 11:58:21 AM PDT by
DIRTYSECRET
(urope. Why do they put up with this.)
To: FredZarguna
Good post. A perfect example of "well if that is the exception, that proves the rule." (That apparently nobody has ever been charged for shooting somebody robbing their restaurant or fast-food joint.)
72 posted on
04/09/2017 1:12:33 PM PDT by
jiggyboy
(Ten percent of poll respondents are either lying or insane)
To: FredZarguna
Unfortunately the person charged in the case cited was not charged for defending himself, but for illegal possession of a firearm as a felon. Odd is it not? A felon carrying a weapon because he knew he worked in a dangerous environment. This felon was making an honest living and just did not want to die.
I would hope the courts just look the other way on this man. He did not want to die and took appropriate action.
92 posted on
04/09/2017 2:41:01 PM PDT by
cpdiii
(Deckhand, Roughneck, Mud Man, Geologist, Pilot, Pharmacist. CONSTITUTUTION IS WORTH DYING FOR!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson