Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: brucedickinson

“Someday, thousands of years from now, archeologists will get to sift through the radioactive teeth where North Korea used to be, and they can postulate what happened to them. They’ll have to wait that long before they go back, since it’ll take that long for the radiation to die down.”
==

I’d go with a neutron bomb, but there isn’t a building in Nork worth saving.


19 posted on 03/19/2017 10:12:17 AM PDT by LouieFisk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: LouieFisk

I was thinking 10K fuel-air. With nitrogen loads, fertilize the ground simultaneously.


27 posted on 03/19/2017 10:17:34 AM PDT by txhurl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: LouieFisk

“I’d go with a neutron bomb, but there isn’t a building in Nork worth saving.”

Than why use a neutron bomb.The neutron bomb was designed to kill people with minimal damage or residual radiation to property.


70 posted on 03/19/2017 10:47:43 AM PDT by puppypusher ( The World is going to the dogs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson