Posted on 03/01/2017 9:13:32 AM PST by simpson96
After losing the presidential election in 2012, Mitt Romney disappeared. The only evidence he still existed came from random sightings—at a movie, a gas station, Disneyland, Costco, McDonald’s, etc. Romney posted a Thanksgiving photo on Facebook and visited the White House on November 29, 2012 at President Barack Obama’s request. He then completely dropped off the face of the earth between December 9, 2012 and February 27, 2013.
It wasn’t until about this time in 2013 that he spoke publicly in an interview with Fox News, after which he disappeared again until people began asking for his opinion on the 2016 presidential candidates.
Losers of past presidential elections have also left the spotlight immediately following campaign losses. (snip)
The same cannot be said for Hillary Clinton. The day after the election, Clinton was photographed with a supporter. She gave her first post-election address just eight days after losing. (snip)
Clinton has also been tweeting regularly. Well, someone’s been tweeting from her account, because some are signed “-Hillary” or “-H” to signify they’re actually from the former candidate. Each time Clinton, or someone, tweets from her account, articles are written. The account tweeted on Inauguration Day and in support of the Women’s March (though none were signed from Clinton herself).
Clinton recorded a video message weeks after the march for the 2017 Makers conference, telling participants “the future is female.”
Who needs men?
“And remember, you are the heroes and history makers, the glass ceiling breakers of the future,” Clinton said. “As I’ve said before, I’ll say again, never doubt you are valuable and powerful and deserving of every chance and every opportunity in the world.”
Well, so long as you’re a woman who holds liberal viewpoints.(snip)
Forgive me if I don’t value the opinion of a twice failed presidential candidate.
(Excerpt) Read more at observer.com ...
Hillary nearly won...but even so, this prospect doesn’t scare me that much.
But THIS, in fact, scares me:
http://www.breitbart.com/video/2017/03/01/oprah-rethinking-presidential-run-donald-trumps-win/
You don’t have to like her...but Oprah is a serious business woman who communicates extraordinarily well.
She would be dangerous in my opinion.
Our best hope is that the d machine keeps her out of this game.
That said, I’m eager to hear from others with a different take on this. (I do still think that Trump takes MI, WI and PA....which makes it impossible....but regardless...she would be, I think, an amazing candidate. Sort of like Trump was and is).
She sometimes would force “gentle”, like when she’d be on Oprah or some such TV show, trying to pull the wool over the eyes of gullible viewers.
If the economy prospers, Trump will stop the s*** out of that racist b****
Her Parkinsons is at the stage where it still allows her to make a couple appearances a week, with long rest periods in between.
Hillary wants to keep the cash coming in... corrupt foreign powers don’t donate to the powerless...
She’s pretending there’s a comeback - there’s not...
Scary pictures.
Little wonder that Slick Willy prefers the company of others.
Here’s Hillary with the Democrat Party... (might be too violent for some)
https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/2965381/mother-kicks-baby-child-would-not-stop-crying-video/
Hillary did not “nearly” win.
Hillary’s mouth writes checks her body can’t cash.
Obama’s mouth writes checks his brain can’t cash.
She’s still a Rooskie funded anti-Semite.
Of course she can’t go away.
One, she’s a narcissist, just like her husband.
Two, quitting means an end to the grift and makes prosecution more likely.
Yes, when I read that Oprah may want to run for president, I choked on my morning coffee. I am very afraid she would be elected, although she lacks even an iota of qualifications. She would capture all the low information voter blacks’ votes and a good many of the low information white voters’ votes. It is both scary and disgusting that a huge percentage of Americans seem to consider the office of president as one that could be adequately filled by a celebrity such as her. I can’t even fathom the degree of liberalism she represents. Can you imagine a military run by her? A national budget? An immigration system? Too scary to even think about.
Neither one of them can believe that they are IRRELEVANT ... for MY money, they always were.... but now, they are universally SEEN to be-and they are not liking it!
Then when she is arrested, she can claim political harassment.
What will she be arrested for? Many FELONIES she has committed are easily proven but the easiest to prove is her ordering destruction of her emails and destruction of her "devices." When destroyed, the evidence was under subpoena from Congress.
Even if Donald Trump doesn't want to face the political heat, she has to be arrested and tried. The Trump government's credibility is on display here.
Yes she is. Whether she likes it or not, she’s being drug into obscurity feet first. By the time year two comes around, H.Clinton will be just a bad memory. She’ll be lucky to escape this without being prosecuted.
Bet the rent.
The first debate question for Oprah should be, “You has been on an infinite amount of diets since you first came on the scene in the 1980’s, and you made a lot of money selling these diets, how come you have always been fat?”
Hillary running again is about the best thing that could happen for us. She has zero appeal and will keep the Democrats infighting all the way to 2020.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.