Replies

Free Republic
Browse · Search

General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Am I the only one who fears there will be some SCOTUS case in the future effectively gutting the First Amendment.

1 posted on 02/21/2017 9:41:33 AM PST by C19fan

[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]

To: C19fan

No muslims allowed is a given, then.

2 posted on 02/21/2017 9:43:02 AM PST by simpson96

[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: C19fan

Guess they’re dropping sports.

3 posted on 02/21/2017 9:51:56 AM PST by ealgeone

[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: C19fan

Not if hilLIAR had won

4 posted on 02/21/2017 9:53:19 AM PST by A_Former_Democrat ("Liberalism is a mental disorder" On FULL Display NOW BOYCOTT Mexico NFL PepsiCO Kellogg's)

[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: C19fan

nother couple of years and we’ll be right where france is now:

“France passes law imposing up to two years prison for running pro-life websites”

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3526403/posts

5 posted on 02/21/2017 9:55:37 AM PST by Bob434

[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: C19fan

Who cares what the court says, if they make free speech illegal, we should all become criminals because we will be following the Constitution, not what some political hack judge has decreed from their ivory tower.

6 posted on 02/21/2017 9:59:33 AM PST by GraceG (Only a fool works hard in an environment where hard work is not appreciated...)

[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: C19fan

Who determines what a hostile view is?

7 posted on 02/21/2017 10:21:32 AM PST by Parley Baer

[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: C19fan

Let me guess, pro-Trump editors need not apply.

9 posted on 02/21/2017 10:25:19 AM PST by Huskrrrr

[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: C19fan

And yet...eliminating free speech is hostile.