The issue is context. Talking about how healthy a mentoring relationship between men and teen boys can be, followed by an explanation how sex between them wouldn't be pedophilia seems indicative of, well, justifying it and approving of it.
What is true and not just “technically” is if a gay man has sex with an underage boy, it’s pedophila whether the boy is 8 or 18.
A bunch of FReepers go absolutely apeshit reading the tea leaves when it comes to this pizzagate stuff, throwing around accusations right and left without any proof of anything yet they have trouble understanding the words Milo said very clearly and deliberately.
‘seems indicative of justifying it and approving it’ - yes, it does, and it is. Milo needs to watch his mouth. I hear he is going into a Christian re-orientation program, tho. Good for him. Should go soon and get some healing.
I have made this observation,myself, right here some years ago during the hooha over the
“paedophile” priests. Most of them went after post pubescent males who were legally still “boys” because they were not yet 18. Of course, in the Left media, it was all PEDOPHILIA! because that makes better propaganda. Homosexuals go after this class of boys because only the true paedophiles among them are attracted to the pre-pubes and the just post pubes are easier to seduce/abuse discretely, at least for a while. Propositioning adult parishioners or trying to work a trick in the confessional would much more likely get instant attention.