Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: nickcarraway
"I recognized, through my eleven years of training and experience as a law enforcement officer, the substance to be some sort of narcotic," the report said."

Let's underline this: Part of the usual "testilying" is working in "my XX years of training and experience" early and often, unprompted. And his pretending that his "training and experience" wasn't sufficient to tell the difference between crack -- or meth, when that became the better drug of choice for whatever reason -- isn't "bad faith" in the eyes of the department? The answer is: because we're living in a police state, folks.

18 posted on 02/11/2017 2:41:57 PM PST by jiggyboy (Ten percent of poll respondents are either lying or insane)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: jiggyboy

In this case the officer is a “she.”


19 posted on 02/11/2017 3:08:55 PM PST by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: jiggyboy
"I recognized, through my eleven years of training and experience as a law enforcement officer, the substance to be some sort of narcotic,"

Ergo, eleven years of training and experience as a law enforcement officer are worth jack squat in identifying narcotics. Good to know.

20 posted on 02/11/2017 3:20:17 PM PST by NobleFree ("law is often but the tyrant's will, and always so when it violates the right of an individual")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson