To: lepton; Moltke
Suppose I were to say "pure nitrogen"? Would that make it a little bit true? As Moltke kindly pointed out to me (post#18) it is the fact that pure nitrogen is a dry gas that makes it stable under pressure. Unlike any gas that might be contaminated with water. Yes, there are other dry gases but nitrogen is the go-to for NASCAR, IndyCar, NASA, the military, airlines, etc.
http://www.getnitrogen.org/sub.php?view=nascar
If the NFL used pure nitrogen as the gas to fill their footballs with, would your statement still be true:
"So the natural variation in pressure of footballs in NFL games from temperature alone is nearly 6 PSI."
30 posted on
02/07/2017 5:10:21 PM PST by
HandyDandy
(Are we our own rulers?,.......or are we ruled by the judiciary?)
To: HandyDandy
The calculation is made for an “ideal gas”, so it’s the best case scenario. Yes, the statement would still be true.
31 posted on
02/08/2017 4:00:14 AM PST by
Moltke
(Reasoning with a liberal is like watering a rock in the hope to grow a building)
To: HandyDandy
If the NFL used pure nitrogen as the gas to fill their footballs with, would your statement still be true:
“So the natural variation in pressure of footballs in NFL games from temperature alone is nearly 6 PSI.”
Yes.
The effects of water vapor condensing are additional.
The main reasons for using Nitrogen in NASCAR are chemical. Nitrogen is chemically relatively inert to each metals and oils/lubricants compared to water and oxygen - especially when hot.
32 posted on
02/08/2017 7:05:13 PM PST by
lepton
("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson