Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 01/31/2017 6:59:21 AM PST by EinNYC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last
To: EinNYC

It’s like putting the cat in the microwave...


2 posted on 01/31/2017 7:00:38 AM PST by Paladin2 (No spellcheck. It's too much work to undo the auto wrong word substitution on mobile devices.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EinNYC

Absolutely no danger.

Worry more about the bacteria in your icemaker.


3 posted on 01/31/2017 7:03:59 AM PST by AlmaKing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EinNYC
I'm not a electric magnetic scientist, but I did stay at a Holiday Inn once...ha.

That said, do you realize how many EM waves travel through your body every day? Think about it: Cell phones, radio, TV, computers, routers, GPS, home devices, etc. No one is dying of those waves penetrating their bodies. Your cats are okay.

4 posted on 01/31/2017 7:08:19 AM PST by A Navy Vet (I'm not Islamophobic - I'm Islamonauseous. Plus LGBTQxyz nauseous.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EinNYC
lessemf.com

Lots of options to protect from all types of radiation.

5 posted on 01/31/2017 7:08:20 AM PST by x_plus_one (A man cannot know himself until he knows those who define themselves against him.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EinNYC

With a cat at my side and many years of RF experience I tell you the risk is zip, zero, Nada. These are extremely low power devices.


6 posted on 01/31/2017 7:08:33 AM PST by bigbob (We have better coverage than Verizon - Can You Hear Us Now?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EinNYC

It’s not a question of how dangerous, it’s simply not dangerous. At all.

Sorry about your last cat but some are predisposed to certain cancers, like all of us. It’s nothing you could have prevented.

Fear of EMF is the result of some anti-industrialist tendencies that began in the Scandinavian countries. Like man-made global warming, it’s a hoax with no scientific basis.


7 posted on 01/31/2017 7:09:07 AM PST by keat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EinNYC
Harmless.
The energy levels are too low to do any damage and it's not cumulative like gamma radiation.

8 posted on 01/31/2017 7:09:25 AM PST by BitWielder1 (I'd rather have Unequal Wealth than Equal Poverty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EinNYC

Just cover the heads of your pets in ordinary tin foil and they will be fine.


9 posted on 01/31/2017 7:09:37 AM PST by MrEdd (MrEdd)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EinNYC

I think you would have to measure it to be sure.

https://www.amazon.com/Gen-El-Gauss-Master/dp/B0004IR6J6


10 posted on 01/31/2017 7:13:21 AM PST by smokingfrog ( sleep with one eye open (<o> ---)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EinNYC

Put your cat in Schrödinger’s Faraday cage.


12 posted on 01/31/2017 7:18:42 AM PST by ImJustAnotherOkie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EinNYC
For 30 years, I've been an RF electronics engineer. I got my degree in 1992, after I had been working in the field for a few years. I design and develop, and test and certify radio transmitters for a living. For the last 20 years, I've worked in wireless utility metering, specifically so-called "smart meters". Before that, I worked in military and radar. I know RF.

On every one of our products, I measure field strength and calculate the RF exposure to humans for specific distances to the product (almost always, 20 cm, though some of our products require further distances). I am 100% confident every one of the products I have taken through certification-- almost a dozen now over my career-- was completely safe for human exposure.

And all these products transmit more RF power than a cordless telephone.

Please don't listen to the EMF paranoids. RF waves are NOT ionizing radiation, despite the hysteria.

13 posted on 01/31/2017 7:22:29 AM PST by backwoods-engineer (Trump won; I celebrated; I'm good. Let's get on with the civil war now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EinNYC

I think this PSA belongs on this thread. Pet lovers, if you have cats or dogs, please never buy window clings, those gel like window decorations. Target is full of them right now, very cheap, to decorate your windows for Valentine’s Day.

Our beautiful YOUNG HEALTHY Balinese cat, Ciel, died from kidney failure after chewing on or eating these last July. We tried for a week to save her. It is still a heartbreak for this family.

They are toxic. Don’t buy them if you have pets.


17 posted on 01/31/2017 7:28:11 AM PST by Yaelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EinNYC

Cue photo of grumpy cat with tinfoil hat


18 posted on 01/31/2017 7:36:44 AM PST by a fool in paradise (The COM-Left is saddened by the death of the Communist dictator Fidel Castro. No surprise there.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EinNYC

I have an RF amp to up a WiFi router’s output to 2 watts to put into a big directional antenna to get great WiFi coverage for the backyard.


20 posted on 01/31/2017 7:40:18 AM PST by Paladin2 (No spellcheck. It's too much work to undo the auto wrong word substitution on mobile devices.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EinNYC

Not even a little bit. Ignore all that EMF hokum.


21 posted on 01/31/2017 7:40:43 AM PST by discostu (Alright you primative screwheads, listen up!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EinNYC

How dangerous is the EMF from cordless phones and routers for pets?


Are you talking CAT5, CAT6, or CAT7?

Unless your cat in capable or receiving RF in between 900 MHz and 60 GHz, it is invisible to WiFi.


24 posted on 01/31/2017 7:50:18 AM PST by Flick Lives
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EinNYC

You ever see “The Fly” remake. It will turn every living organism inside out.

Oh. And not to worry. That big ball of light in the sky doesn’t put out any radiation at all..

Of course I am being facetious and resorting to hyperbole like a liberal. No harm at all.


26 posted on 01/31/2017 7:52:54 AM PST by Organic Panic (Rich White Man Evicts Poor Black Family From Public Housing - MSNBCPBSCNNNYTABC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EinNYC

I’m an engineer, not a doctor, however, there is no known mechanism by which RF energy damages DNA - tissue heating is the only known provable effect, and that doesn’t hurt DNA.

RF exposure standards are based on tissue heating.

As an example, a wifi access point putting out 200mW at 1 ft is less than 1/10th the general public exposure standard.


29 posted on 01/31/2017 8:05:37 AM PST by RFEngineer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EinNYC

My dog has been exposed to EMF for about 13 1/2 years. It didn’t effect him much when he was younger, but now he mostly just wants to lay on my bed all day.


39 posted on 01/31/2017 8:30:06 AM PST by Joe 6-pack (Qui me amat, amat et canem meum.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EinNYC

Pets have routers?


43 posted on 01/31/2017 8:38:25 AM PST by Fresh Wind (Hillary: Go to jail. Go directly to jail. Do not pass GO. Do not collect 2 billion dollars.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson