TRANSGENDER POLITICS UNMASKED

http://www.catholicleague.org ^ | 01/06/2017 | Bill Donohue

[heterosupremacist]

Bill Donohue comments on a woman who sued a Catholic hospital for refusing to change her sex:

The mainstream media are floating a fake news story. They are saying that a “man filed suit against a Catholic hospital in New Jersey on Thursday for refusing to allow a surgeon to perform a hysterectomy on him at the facility.” But a man cannot have a hysterectomy—only those with a womb can. They are called women.

I was slightly dishonest. The sentence I quoted, from an AP story, began by saying “A transgender man….” The really dishonest people are those in the media, and elsewhere, who want to brainwash us into thinking that a woman who seeks to remove her uterus is a man because she says she is. If she identified as a giraffe, would that make her so?

The real story here, of course, is the manipulative and dishonest politics of a sex-engineering activist seeking to shove her sexual agenda down the throat of Catholics. This New Jersey woman, Jionni Conforti, had lots of places she could have gone to in her quest to have a surgeon make the “transition,” but she intentionally chose a Catholic hospital, knowing it would resist.

Catholic institutions believe in nature and nature’s God, and therefore reject the fiction that sex is not determined at birth. As such, they refuse to perform operations that would deny this verity.

While this case has its bizarre elements, the root issue is quite simple: the First Amendment presumptively insulates religious institutions from the reach of government. Catholic hospitals that are denied the right to follow Catholic teachings are no longer Catholic. Ms. Conforti knows that, and that is why she is suing.

[Bigg Red]

A woman does not just show up at a hospital and demand a hysterectomy even if she really needs one. She must be referred by a physician. So another fake news story.

[Mrs. Don-o]

From another news outlet covering this story, I gleaned that this gender-confused woman actually had lined up a surgeon willing do to the requested mutilation, but the Catholic hospital wouldn’t allow it to be done under their aegis or on their premises.

She ended up being surgically mutilated 3 months later, of course at a different hospital. She decided to sue the Catholic hospital for big bucks for the “humiliation” of being refused “transgender care”.

I think she knew perfectly well that it is forbidden by Catholic Health Ethics (and every “ETHICS” rooted in physical reality) to intentionally maim a patient. That means deliberately removing or impairing a limb, organ or system, destroying the normal function, if said organ is not diseased, cancerous or whatever.

Doesn’t matter if it’s a sex organ or an eye, leg, ear or any other organ. Doesn’t matter if its a male or a female. Doesn’t matter if they asked you to do it.

Catholic hospitals do not “maim on demand”.

A normal, observant Catholic would rather be fined or be imprisoned than to cooperate in any way with mutilating a mentally disturbed patient.

The patient intentionally targeted this hospital because she is severely anti-reality, severely anti-Catholic, severely greedy, or all of the above.

[G Larry]

Most homosexuals were sexually molested as children.

They seek to normalize their behavior to make it easier to molest YOUR children.