Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: C19fan
“Prefer the American practice of keep the same base name but using bloc to describe variants. This Ivan practice of giving what are modifications of existing designs new designations is confusing.”

True. I guess it's propaganda to make it look like totally new hardware when in fact it's just a new “block” of MiG-29.

3 posted on 01/04/2017 7:42:29 AM PST by Grzegorz 246
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Grzegorz 246

“True. I guess it’s propaganda to make it look like totally new hardware when in fact it’s just a new “block” of MiG-29.”

How dare they assign different names to different projects! Actually, our system was also created for shady reasons. Its incredibly hard to get congress to approve a new fighter program, but very easy to get approval to “upgrade” an existing design. So we pretend its the same plane.
the most egregious example of this is the F-18 Super Hornet. Although it is shaped to resemble an original F-18, it is a completely different aircraft. It is much larger and has different fuselage, engines, wings, tail, hardpoints, and avionics.

But the Navy called it the F-18 E/F rather than go to congress and ask to build the new F-19 or whatever. Its barely more similar to the original than a Hellcat was to a Wildcat.


13 posted on 01/04/2017 8:49:20 AM PST by DesertRhino
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson