Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: csvset

Frankly, at the cost per pound of putting stuff up there it would seem someone would begin to realize this stuff has value. It would seem there could be a tidy profit in recycling this stuff.


8 posted on 12/09/2016 4:50:54 AM PST by wastoute (Government cannot redistribute wealth. Government can only redistribute poverty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: wastoute

The stuff still belongs to whoever paid to make it and put it up there. And some of it is classified in nature.

This could lead to some interesting lawsuits.


9 posted on 12/09/2016 5:03:42 AM PST by Fresh Wind (Hillary: Go to jail. Go directly to jail. Do not pass GO. Do not collect 2 billion dollars.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: wastoute

It would seem there could be a tidy profit in recycling this stuff.

As prefab pieces it is worth keeping in orbit, but space vehicles are so specific and specialized that I doubt much of it could be used as-is. A space-baced smelter and casting platform could use it. If NASA had kept main shuttle fuel tanks in orbit, we could have a large habitat there by now.


20 posted on 12/09/2016 5:41:58 AM PST by Dr. Wu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: wastoute

The cost of getting it up there doesn’t increase the value, it’s up there. And most of it is pure junk, bolts and bits of metal that come off during various transitions in missions. The biggest problem is inertia, the stuff is traveling faster than the speed of sound to stay in orbit, make it hurt bad when it hits something. Also makes it difficult to clean up.


32 posted on 12/09/2016 9:59:10 AM PST by discostu (Alright you primative screwheads, listen up!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson