Posted on 11/17/2016 7:11:34 PM PST by nickcarraway
Two double-murderers were spared execution Thursday after years on death row when the Florida Supreme Court ordered both to be re-sentenced to life without parole.
In one case, the justices decided that death would amount to unequal punishment; In the other, they said mitigating factors should have ruled out execution.
Robert McCloud, 35, faced capital punishment for the 2009 murders of Tamiqa Taylor, 26, and Dustin Freeman, 23, who were killed while McCloud and three other men tortured and robbed Wilkins Merlin, a known drug dealer, according to court documents.
The group ransacked Merlin's house, taking about $5,000 in cash, $10,000 in marijuana and a handgun. But they were convinced Merlin was hiding more and tortured him, trying to learn where. They dropped a 40-pound dumbbell on his head, sliced his arms with a steak knife, doused him with boiling water and bleach, and shot him several times in the stomach, testicle and thigh.
They also killed Freeman and Taylor, with gunshots to the heads from close range.
Merlin survived, as did his 3-year-old daughter, who was found physically unharmed at the crime scene.
Prosecutors could have sought the death penalty for all four. Instead, they made plea deals and the other three received sentences of 10 to 15 years for second-degree murder in exchange for their testimony against McCloud.
The Supreme Court said McCloud's double death sentences were unfair because his co-defendants were just as culpable and received far less severe sentences. The court also noted that the jury determined McCloud wasn't the shooter.
Terrance Phillips, 25, had been awaiting execution for the murders of Mateo Hernandez-Perez, 26, and Reynaldo Antunes-Padilla, 30, whom he shot during a botched 2009 robbery. After two women posing as prostitutes entered the victims' apartment, Phillips and a friend burst in and a struggle ensued, during which Phillips fired three shots, killing both men.
The Supreme Court agreed Phillips is guilty, but said he shouldn't have been sentenced to death because he was 18 at the time and is borderline intellectually disabled.
Don’t know how to react to this ... flaming libs on Florida SC?
They dropped a 40-pound dumbbell on his head, sliced his arms with a steak knife, doused him with boiling water and bleach, and shot him several times in the stomach, testicle and thigh...
This should have warranted swift execution right after the trial.
WTH?!?!
They’d make good ISIS members.
And the guy lived!!
Yup. FL SC remains a leftist bastion. The same court that gave us the 2000 Election debacle and also demanding via a Constitutionally dubious law that the FL GOP majority draw more seats for their Democrat allies to win (including for the execrable Orange Menace Charlie Crist, who appointed some of those members - can you say “Conflict of interest ?”).
I’d go with “an eye for an eye” here. It’s only fair.
Please deals can be the only way to get ANY conviction,or they can be a lazy prosecutor’s favorite tool.
I think the “cruel and unusual punishment” thingy the founding fathers wrote would prohibit that :)
How did these 2 fit in? Nothing said about them at all, except they were killed.
Note well the use of the word “AND” as opposed to “OR.” I’d argue that giving someone the same treatment as they gave their victim is not cruel, it is just. And let’s make this a lot less USUAL.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.