Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: sig226

They measure the skid marks, crush damage, and vehicle displacement.


Yeah, I can understand that, but 134? Why not 135?

That’s the big red flag to me. This is not as much of a hard science as they would have us believe.


15 posted on 11/07/2016 9:29:12 AM PST by Mr. Douglas (Today is your life. What are you going to do with it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: Mr. Douglas

Probably they put the weights of the cars and the distances involved into a formula and it produced that number. If they fudged or approximated the number, the lawyers would have a claim: “What else did you fudge?”

The photos in the article don’t look like a one hundred and anything mile an hour wreck. I got hit at 50 mph. I was stopped behind a stalled car. Later, I measured the displacement of the body of my car. It was crushed 29”, and it was a station wagon with a solid frame. I don’t know how far forward he pushed me, but I know they also include that in the formula.

The county police in my old area set up a Fatal Accident Response Team with the local cops. The F.A.R.T. measured skid marks. It was also a brown car. I was surprised that they left it that way for two years before someone made them change it.


42 posted on 11/07/2016 3:14:16 PM PST by sig226
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson