Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: sagar

Then why does the bossy, meddling mother-in-law narrative go back hundreds if not thousands of years in all cultures? It isn’t a recent development.


7 posted on 10/25/2016 11:35:01 AM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (You cannot invade the mainland US. There'd be a rifle behind every blade of grass.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: 2ndDivisionVet
Then why does the bossy, meddling mother-in-law narrative go back hundreds if not thousands of years in all cultures? It isn’t a recent development.

One must differentiate.

In most cultures throughout history, it was the husband's mother who was the "mother-in-law from Hell," constantly finding fault with her daughter-in-law.

Only in modern Western culture do we see the wife's mother brow-beating, berating, and generally making life miserable for the husband.

Regards,

15 posted on 10/25/2016 11:52:25 AM PDT by alexander_busek (Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Most cultures were clearly patriarchal, so they didnt have to worry about bossy mothers of their wives. The WIVES might have had to endure bossy mothers of their husbands, however. I think the narratives were of bossy mothers of the husbands, not the wives.

Females were GIVEN away and done. Only recently has had that changed. Giving of the bride in weddings are meaningless symbolism now.


19 posted on 10/25/2016 12:00:11 PM PDT by sagar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson