Posted on 10/22/2016 11:40:43 PM PDT by MrChips
Donald Trump called on voters Saturday to help him defeat a “totally rigged system,” delivering a speech billed as the closing argument for his presidential campaign that became a battle cry against the forces that he said conspire against him and the American people. Trailing in most polls with 17 days until the Nov. 8 election, the Republican nominee offered himself as a “once in a lifetime” agent of change to revive the economy and stamp out Washington corruption. He drew a stark contrast between his plan and the more-of-the-same government that he said Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton would run to benefit herself and her cronies. “We will drain the swamp in Washington, D.C., and replace it with a new government — of, by and for the people,” Mr. Trump said in Gettysburg, Pa., a site he chose because of Lincoln’s historic address there and which he said reflected his similar goal of unifying the country. “I’m asking the American people to rise above the noise and clutter of our broken politics and to embrace that great faith and optimism that has always been the central ingredient in the American character . . . .
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...
It would be curious what would occur first under a President Clinton, an impeachment or a resignation because of the Parkinsons.
That’s why we have to ensure that DJT will win by November 8.
“It would be curious what would occur first under a President Clinton, an impeachment or a resignation because of the Parkinsons.”
And them we would have Sugar Kaine....... think about that.
A worthless faggot ...
Remember in 2008 and 2012 when we thought nothing could be worse than an Obama Presidency?
Jarrett apparently is not sure there is a double standard, since he finds himself hiding behind the word “Apparently.” when we all KNOW there is a double standard. Another very important distinction between Hitlery and Martin is that he confined the documents to his home where Hitlery spread national security documents around the world on the Internet. Martin at least retained a semblance of control over the documents, whereas Hitlery didn’t give a damn who got their hands on our national security secrets. She also did the crime for ulterior motives - to hid her criminal enterprise activities, whereas Martin likely did it so he could have access to the documents at home for his work activities. In other words, he had no nefarious, criminal intent. I know it doesn’t make it right, but there are major differences and now he likely goes to jail.
me thinks you meant to post on another thread... but nice comments none the less!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.