I like this one:
https://www.intellihub.com/clinton-campaign-salvage-program-set-to-roll-out-soft-kill-technology/
I’m hard-pressed to think of a more overrated actor than Tom Hanks.
Tom can go #### himself.
Get this. Just got an email from PAUL RYAN asking for money.
My Response:
Mr. Ryan,
you ####ed Trump and now you want money. Get the #### out of here :)
It’s a Movie Tom and its’ Not Real
...which he just happens to be in.
Well, kinda, thinking about Soros’ hand in it and all. But, libs are too stoopid to see the light even when it is shining in their eyes.
Tom, did you vote early and got your BJ from Madonna already? Your rotted brain is probably the result of some exotic STD she gave you. Enjoy your insanity—Capone did.
How would we ever survive without the help of the magnificent think tank full of thoughtful geniuses in Hollywood looking out for all of us poor ignorant working slobs who never acted a day in our life.
Way to go Tom!
That whole: “I will invest in America by eating the rich and I will do it for the children” crap is completely stupid!!
America needs detailed, thoughtful policy positions — you know: the kind Trump has documented.
Let me guess:
the evil mastermind of the movie has strange hair and an orange face, right..?
Tom Hanks ought to go hank himself.
So Hanks is in a movie where the bad guy is a George Soros clone.
Another Hollywood dipshit who has come out of the closet of late.
Hey Hanks, you dumbass, enjoy the drunk driving illegals in the People’s Republic of California when they crash into your limo while they’re driving 90 miles an hour.
Clancy’s Rainbow 6 had a similar premise.
Simple solution: Welfare
Simple solution: Social Security
Simple solution: Medicaid
Simple solution: Section 8 housing
Etc...
Tom should talk with fellow actor Leonardo DiCaprio, we think that all environmental problems will be solved by the simple solution of immediately stopping the burning of all fossil feels to power our modern industrial society.
Mrs. Clinton is not advocating a single solution; but she has demonstrated a combination of corruption, ineptitude & incompetence, that will bear a more critical analysis than Tom Hanks is likely to provide.
That a woman who has been politically active, her entire adult life, among a people with the most successful history of economic achievement over their first century and a quarter, of any people on earth, under a Constitutional Government designed to protect that people from a bureaucratic pestilence, which has been the bane of most nations; that such a woman has so missed the essential point of the American achievement, is staggering in its implications.
Mrs. Clinton claimed that a Clinton Government would rebuild the "Middle Class." Was she totally unaware that the American Middle Class clearly built itself? That the American Middle Class resulted from naturally energized individuals, aspiring to achieve the good life, who risked everything to first clear a wilderness, work hard, generation to generation, to save & accumulate the attributes of the good life; with the result that by 1913--the year that a graduated income tax first became Constitutional, this Settler built Federation of newly settled States, had already surpassed every one of the great powers of Europe in industrial strength.
To "rebuild" the "Middle Class," Mrs. Clinton vowed to make the most successful Americans--those who had achieved the most--pay increased taxes; she called it "paying their 'fair' share." But it was clearly to be a tax on success--a tax to fund a raft of new programs (a cancer or pestilence of an expanded bureaucracy). She was obviously indifferent to the fact that the biggest impediment to any poor person with ambition, actually launching a small business to improve his status, is an almost incomprehensible explosion in bureaucratic regulations, most of which premised on the same flawed understanding of how people actually advance, which Mrs. Clinton displayed, on the 19th.
Americans used to learn by experience. What were the experience based lessons of what transpired from the drafting of our written Constitution in 1787, until the passage of the income tax amendment in 1913? Are they instructive or not, for what actually works for human advancement?
The Constitution prior to 1913, absolutely interdicted a tax driven war on the accumulation of individual wealth. Article I, Section 9, which Mrs. Clinton should have remembered from Law School, provided that no direct tax on individual Americans could be applied in any way but pro-capita. (That is Warren Buffet would pay the same tax--not the same percentage tax--but the same tax as Joe the Plumber. The Founders had no desire to limit individual success. They sought only to encourage it.
Under there experience based philosophy, there were almost certainly not even 1% of the bureaucratic regulations, with which Americans seeking to improve their lot, must face today. In place of today's pursuit of grievances, real or imagined, there was universal admiration for the high achievers! And the growth rate of a people freed to achieve, was the economic phenomenon of human history.
We do not pretend to know whether it was in her indoctrination by Marxist Pied Pipers, in her late teens, or pure confusion in whatever she is struggling with today. But Mrs. Clinton is utterly clueless on how a dynamic economy works; as she is utterly unaware of the dynamic, interactive factors, that drive or stagnate any human aspiration or achievement. What is absolutely clear, even if one ignores her lack of a moral compass in her political dealings; the woman is absolutely unqualified to be President of the United States.
This is one more reason why we must win this election for Donald Trump.
William Flax
[This may be reproduced, if in full context, with or without attribution.]
The Law of Diminishing Returns has taken hold of me regarding Hanks and his movies.