Breathtaking arrogance of CNN claiming WE aren't allowed to read them, only THEY are allowed to read them, then they will tell us what they really mean.
Just Wow. Video proof at link. It is also a long article.
1 posted on
10/16/2016 6:26:28 PM PDT by
lafroste
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-37 next last
To: lafroste
It’s not arrogance, our ability to know the truth has been outlawed.
2 posted on
10/16/2016 6:28:43 PM PDT by
Williams
(The (republican) party is over.)
To: lafroste
...Paris September 13, 1787
“...what country can preserve it’s liberties if their rulers are not warned from time to time that their people preserve the spirit of resistance? let them take arms. the remedy is to set them right as to facts, pardon & pacify them. what signify a few lives lost in a century or two? the tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots & tyrants. it is it’s natural manure...”
4 posted on
10/16/2016 6:31:52 PM PDT by
Sasparilla
(Hillary for Prison 2016)
To: lafroste
So many journalists. So few lamp posts.
6 posted on
10/16/2016 6:38:06 PM PDT by
Rockpile
(GOP legislators-----caviar eating surrender monkeys.)
To: lafroste
WOW! That was exactly the position the Holy See took about Bibles being written in a language other than Latin.
The Roman Catholic hierarchy did not want commoners to read the Bible. It has been a thousand years and elites have not changed.
7 posted on
10/16/2016 6:40:34 PM PDT by
SatinDoll
(A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN IS BORN IN THE USA OF TWO USA CITIZENS)
To: lafroste
Why aren’t ANY attorneys online or on television refuting this crap?
8 posted on
10/16/2016 6:43:32 PM PDT by
Talisker
(One who commands, must obey.)
To: lafroste
Is the Establishmedia hating the internet more and more.
Pray America wakes
9 posted on
10/16/2016 6:45:07 PM PDT by
bray
(Because you would be in jail)
To: lafroste
It is the DemonRAT’s strategy all ready indicated in a Podesta email that it is imperative to keep the American people uninformed. My question: where are our Republican representatives who find out about this unconstitutional drivel and are not coming out big against it? It is making people’s support of the Republican party a thing of the past.
10 posted on
10/16/2016 6:45:26 PM PDT by
jonrick46
(The Left has a mental disorder: A totalitarian mindset..)
To: lafroste
So if we all read them are they going to arrest all of us! Get real Toads!
11 posted on
10/16/2016 6:46:14 PM PDT by
hoosiermama
(“Christian faith is not the past but the present and the future. Make it stronger. "DJT)
To: lafroste
Chris Cuomo is a licensed attorney. I would go with what he says. He is an honorable man. They are all honorable men.
To: lafroste
CNN several times each day lives up to its old nickname: Certainly Not News.
Certainly Not News (CNN nickname)
The Cable News Network (CNN), a 24-hour cable news channel, was founded by Ted Turner and first broadcast on June 1, 1980. The unflattering CNN nickname of Certainly Not News has been cited in print since at least 1993.
CNN has also been nicknamed the Chicken Noodle News (cited in print since 1981), the Communist News Network (cited in print since 1991), the Clinton News Network (cited in print since 1992), the CIA News Network (cited in print since 1997), the Criminal News Network (cited in print since 1998), the Corporate News Network (cited in print since 1999), the Cartoon News Network (cited in print since 2000) and Crap Not News (cited in print since 2007).
http://www.barrypopik.com/index.php/new_york_city/entry/certainly_not_news
13 posted on
10/16/2016 6:48:27 PM PDT by
Grampa Dave
(We are not electing a saint. We are electing an ass kicker! Vote for Trump! Defeat Illiarily!)
To: lafroste
Can you read them if you don’t know what the big “C” on the top of the page means?
14 posted on
10/16/2016 6:50:00 PM PDT by
freefdny
To: lafroste
To Chris Cuomo.
I’ve already read some of them. Come and get me, scumbag.
16 posted on
10/16/2016 6:53:02 PM PDT by
dynachrome
(When an empire dies, you are left with vast monuments in front of which peasants squat to defecate)
To: lafroste
GTH CC!
Quite Sincerely,
‘Pod
17 posted on
10/16/2016 6:53:04 PM PDT by
sauropod
(Beware the fury of a patient man. I've lost my patience!)
To: lafroste
I shot the sheriff
But I did not read the wikileaks.
18 posted on
10/16/2016 6:55:01 PM PDT by
MUDDOG
To: lafroste; All
Download and print your credentials. Get as fancy as you want. Add pics, laminate them, etc.
“A Free Press Deserves Free Credentials!
Join The Constitution First Amendment Press Association
Press Credentials Available Free of Charge!”
http://cfapa.org/
19 posted on
10/16/2016 6:56:33 PM PDT by
dynachrome
(When an empire dies, you are left with vast monuments in front of which peasants squat to defecate)
To: lafroste
Squirrel excrement!
Who gets to say who is media?
WE are the media, everyone of us.
It’s communication.
20 posted on
10/16/2016 6:58:18 PM PDT by
Lorianne
To: lafroste
CNN is wrong. We have "fair use" rights to read whatever is out there in the international media. What we don't have the right to do is disseminate information that we get from government-restricted (or other protected - such as hospital patient data) information systems without following proper processes. See
https://www.justice.gov/sites/default/files/criminal-ccips/legacy/2015/03/26/prosecuting_ip_crimes_manual_2013.pdf for some federal guidelines on all this. One thing I've learned this year quite clearly (with the Clinton investigation where the AG & her husband met just days before it was announced they wouldn't prosecute such a clear-cut case) is that when it comes to the criminal justice system that honesty/fairness just isn't respected now like it used to be :( 5. Fair Use The fair use doctrine is an affirmative defense to copyright infringement. It allows the unauthorized use of copyrighted material under certain circumstances generally limited to useful or beneficial purposes with minimal impact on the market for the work. Specifically, the fair use doctrine, codified at 17 U.S.C. § 107, allows the unauthorized use of copyrighted works for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching ..., scholarship, or research and other, unspecified, purposes and uses. Fair use is designed to ensure that the rights of authors are balanced with the interest of the public in the free flow of information. See, e.g., Pierre Leval, Toward a Fair Use Standard, 103 Harv. L. Rev. 1105, 1110 (1990) (commentary by Judge Pierre Leval, United States District Court for the Southern District of New York). Congress has noted that fair use is the most important limitation on the exclusive rights granted copyright owners, H.R. Rep. No. 94-1476, at 65 (1976), reprinted in 1976 U.S.C.C.A.N. 5659, 5678, and the Supreme Court has characterized fair use as one of copyright laws built-in accommodations to the First Amendment. See Eldred v. Ashcroft, 537 U.S. 186, 219-20 (2003). By design, the fair use doctrine is fluid and applies not according to definite rules, but rather according to a multi-factor balancing test. See H.R. Rep. No. 94-1476, at 66 (1976). The statute cites four non-exclusive factors: (1) the purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes; (2) the nature of the copyrighted work; 70 Prosecuting Intellectual Property Crimes (3) the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole; and (4) the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work.
22 posted on
10/16/2016 6:59:20 PM PDT by
Degaston
To: lafroste
Dumb news reader inadvertently authenticated Wikileaks while trying to prevent the public from reading it.
To: lafroste
I saw the CNN “news” clip on Drudge ... the turd doesn’t fall far from the tree!
27 posted on
10/16/2016 7:04:24 PM PDT by
RetiredTexasVet
(The Mofia is a private crime family; whereas, the DOJ is the gov't's political crime family.)
To: lafroste
CNN, you f**king traitors.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-37 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson