Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hillary says she is Goldwater?
Self | 10-10-16 | Self

Posted on 10/10/2016 5:11:29 PM PDT by lavaroise

I know GOP is pretending to confront Russia on Allepo. She is all talk of war yet promotes START treaties. Yet I think it would be worth it to make a Goldwater type accuzation on her, with a political ad showing her starting WWIII with images of Atomic explosions over LA.


TOPICS: Chit/Chat
KEYWORDS: hillary; russia; syria; war

1 posted on 10/10/2016 5:11:29 PM PDT by lavaroise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: lavaroise

Sorry, I meant Hillary, not GOP.


2 posted on 10/10/2016 5:11:59 PM PDT by lavaroise (s)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lavaroise

Goldwater girl, after all.


3 posted on 10/10/2016 5:13:32 PM PDT by ecomcon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lavaroise
I know Hillary is pretending to confront Russia... She is all talk of war yet promotes START treaties.

The Soros-supported Obama administration has been out to help the Russians regain superpower status from day one, and even before. Don't fall for the smoke and mirrors BS coming from the Russians, or this administration. Facts are facts...

From the campaign trail, 2008...

Obama Pledges Cuts in Missile Defense, Space, and Nuclear Weapons Programs

February 29, 2008 :: News
MissileThreat.com

A video has surfaced of Presidential candidate Senator Barack Obama talking on his plans for strategic issues such as nuclear weapons and missile defense.

The full text from the video, as released, reads as follows:

Thanks so much for the Caucus4Priorities, for the great work you've been doing. As president, I will end misguided defense policies and stand with Caucus4Priorities in fighting special interests in Washington.

First, I'll stop spending $9 billion a month in Iraq. I'm the only major candidate who opposed this war from the beginning. And as president I will end it.[i.e. not win it]

Second, I will cut tens of billions of dollars in wasteful spending.

I will cut investments in unproven missile defense systems.

I will not weaponize space.

I will slow our development of future combat systems.

And I will institute an independent "Defense Priorities Board" to ensure that the Quadrennial Defense Review is not used to justify unnecessary spending.

Third, I will set a goal of a world without nuclear weapons. To seek that goal, I will not develop new nuclear weapons; I will seek a global ban on the production of fissile material; and I will negotiate with Russia to take our ICBMs off hair-trigger alert, and to achieve deep cuts in our nuclear arsenals.

You know where I stand. I've fought for open, ethical and accountable government my entire public life. I don't switch positions or make promises that can't be kept. I don't posture on defense policy and I don't take money from federal lobbyists for powerful defense contractors. As president, my sole priority for defense spending will be protecting the American people. Thanks so much.

Article: Obama Pledges Cuts in Missile Defense, Space, and Nuclear Weapons Programs:

http://web.archive.org/web/20090412030633/http://missilethreat.com/archives/id.7086/detail.asp

"MissileThreat.com is a project of The Claremont Institute devoted to understanding and promoting the requirements for the strategic defense of the United States."
__________________________________________________________

From Investor's Business Daily, Jan 2012:

Obama To Betray Missile Defense Secrets To Moscow

Investor's Business Daily ^ | January 9, 2012 | IBD staff

Appeasement: From ObamaCare to recess appointments, honoring the Constitution has not been an administration hallmark. But when it comes to betraying secrets to mollify the Russians, it becomes a document the president hides behind.

It was bad enough that the 2012 defense authorization bill signed by President Obama set America on a downward spiral of military mediocrity.

He also issued a signing statement, something he once opposed, saying that language in the bill aimed at protecting top-secret technical data on the U.S. Standard Missile-3 - linchpin of our missile defense - might impinge on his constitutional foreign-policy authority.

Section 1227 of the defense law prohibits spending any funds that would be used to give Russian officials access to sensitive missile-defense technology as part of a cooperation agreement without first sending Congress a report identifying the specific secrets, how they'd be used and steps to protect the data from compromise.

The president is required to certify that any technology shared will not be passed on to third parties such as China, North Korea or Iran, that the Russians will not use transferred secrets to develop countermeasures and that the Russians are reciprocating in sharing missile-defense technology. ..."

"In his signing statement, Obama said he would treat these legal restrictions as 'non-binding' and that 'my administration will also interpret and implement section 1244 (sic) in a manner that does not interfere with the president's constitutional authority to conduct foreign affairs and avoids the undue disclosure of sensitive diplomatic communications.'

Betraying our secrets is easy for a president who betrayed allies Poland and the Czech Republic to placate Moscow.

Poland was to host ground-based interceptors such as those we've deployed in California and Alaska, with missile-tracking radar deployed in the Czech Republic.

Obama pulled the plug when Moscow objected. Never mind, he said, we have a better approach: a four-phase plan that calls for using three versions of the Navy's Standard SM-3 interceptor missile that forms the backbone of its Aegis missile-defense system.

The fourth phase consists of a missile still on the drawing board scheduled for deployment by 2020, a version of the SM-3 called the Block IIB. It would intercept hostile missiles in the "early intercept" phase before an enemy missile could release its warheads and decoys. The Russians want the SM-3's secrets, and Obama appears to be willing to turn them over.

The president wants to save the New Start Treaty, which the Russians have threatened to abandon if we try to fully implement President Reagan's dream of defeating a nuclear missile attack.

Russia has unilaterally asserted that any qualitative or quantitative improvement in U.S. missile defenses would be grounds for withdrawal from the treaty.

Read More At Investor's Business Daily:
http://news.investors.com/ibd-editorials/010912-597158-obama-gives-russia-missile-defense-secrets.htm#ixzz3jXmMbVwY
___________________________________________________

March 2012...

"Obama was talking with Russian President Dmitry Medvedev when neither of them realized that their conversation was being picked up by microphones. Here is what they said:

Obama: "On all these issues, but particularly missile defense, this, this can be solved, but it's important for him to give me space."

Medvedev: "Yeah, I understand. I understand your message about space. Space for you ..."

Obama: "This is my last election. After my election, I have more flexibility."

Medvedev: "I understand. I will transmit this information to Vladimir."

"This is my last election. After my election I have more flexibility." That statement tells us much about the president's mindset.

The specific mention of missile defense is worrisome enough. Mr. Obama has retreated from the missile defense plan that was negotiated with European allies during the George W. Bush administration.

Apparently, he is signaling Moscow that he intends to retreat further. The clear implication from the president's comments is that he cannot tell the American people before the election what he plans to do after the election.

In addition, there is the phrase "on all these issues," implying more is at stake than just missile defense."

Article: Obama plans double cross on missile defense
When it comes to keeping America safe, we shouldn't be too flexible:
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2012/mar/29/obama-plans-double-cross-on-missile-defense/print/
__________________________________________________________

Image and video hosting by TinyPic

 photo Putin KGB - Thanks Obama 01_zpsnqylnyno.jpg


4 posted on 10/10/2016 5:15:16 PM PDT by ETL (Trump-PENCE 2016!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lavaroise

I thought she was Lincoln.


5 posted on 10/10/2016 5:20:13 PM PDT by ButThreeLeftsDo (Gear Up)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lavaroise

Try Nixon, Cankles, only instead of 18-1/2 minutes of erased audiotape, try thousands upon thousands of classified emails bleach-bitted and sledge-hammered into oblivion.


6 posted on 10/10/2016 5:21:27 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (If you are not prepared to use force to defend civilization, then be prepared to accept barbarism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lavaroise
Good, let's run an updated Hillary Daisy attack ad like the one used against Goldwater. We can use all of her bluster against Russia. It's perfect!!!
7 posted on 10/10/2016 5:23:28 PM PDT by Robert DeLong
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lavaroise

A-u-H-puke-o


8 posted on 10/10/2016 5:26:00 PM PDT by moovova
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lavaroise
I though she was claiming to be Abe Lincoln.
9 posted on 10/10/2016 5:26:14 PM PDT by Gay State Conservative (Deplorables' Lives Matter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Robert DeLong
We can use all of her bluster against Russia.

Meanwhile, as I've shown countless times, it was the Soros-supported Obama administration that strengthened Russia on so many levels, while substantially weakening us. Putin has to privately love Obama. How could he not, after all Obama's done for him, and all Obama's done to weaken the US.

10 posted on 10/10/2016 6:00:03 PM PDT by ETL (Trump-PENCE 2016!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: lavaroise

[Hillary says she is goldwater?]

Well, that’s what Huma says because of hillary’s special showers.


11 posted on 10/10/2016 6:10:06 PM PDT by RetSignman (Obama is the walking, talking middle finger in the face of America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lavaroise

Not LA. San Francisco. The North Koreans are going to be threatening to drop the H bomb in the next 4 years.


12 posted on 10/10/2016 6:16:03 PM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lavaroise

Goldwater would be the kind of Republican easily fooled by Mrs. Bill if he were still around to be played for a patsy.


13 posted on 10/10/2016 6:43:33 PM PDT by Theodore R. (Trump-Pence, 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Robert DeLong

yep. That is the ad I was refering to


14 posted on 10/10/2016 6:50:50 PM PDT by JudgemAll (Democrats Fed. job-security Whorocracy & hate:hypocrites must be gay like us or be tested/crucified)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ETL

As Trump
said, she is all talk, no substance.


15 posted on 10/10/2016 6:52:27 PM PDT by JudgemAll (Democrats Fed. job-security Whorocracy & hate:hypocrites must be gay like us or be tested/crucified)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: All

This is a very important and under-reported aspect of the election. Can we really trust Hillary Clinton on matters of national security?

She has made an issue of Trump’s temperament. What about her temperament? There are dozens of reports of her going ballistic with people over relatively minor things. What’s going to happen if Putin gets her goat?

And what blackmail do foreign leaders have over the Clintons? Donald Trump has done a bit of loose talking but what has Bill Clinton done that they have on tape or with sworn witnesses available? The Clintons could be very high value blackmail targets.


16 posted on 10/10/2016 7:02:19 PM PDT by Peter ODonnell (Pray for enlightenment and true justice in these times of mass delusion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson