Posted on 09/18/2016 2:02:11 PM PDT by MarchonDC09122009
Nuclear Waste Flight at Wick (First UK to US Weapons grade Uranium air transfer)
http://www.fightercontrol.co.uk/forum/viewtopic.php?f=73&p=846604
Nuclear Waste Flight at Wick - Sat 17/9
Sun Sep 18, 2016 10:49 am
As reported in the "Sunday post" a military aircraft loaded up yesterday the first cargo of nuclear waste from the UK to the USA. The aircraft reported to have flown to South Carolina. Having now seen another Sunday paper the aircraft in question used was a USAF C-17
Has the US media informed us about this? Only saw this in UK news (as expected)
Does everyone know this 18 month duration nuke waste transfer deal the UK recently made with the US?
Flying 800 kg of weapons grade uranium waste to the US - What could go wrong?...
Great danger in air transport of nuclear wastes: anger in Aberdeen
Posted by Christina MacPherson
flag-UKFury over “dangerous” nuclear flights from the Highlands to US, Aberdeen Press and Journal 2 September 2016 by Iain Ramage Road around Wick Airport will be regularly shut over the next 18 months so nuclear waste can be taken be flown to the US. Plans to transport highly enriched uranium (HEU) from Dounreay in Caithness to the US emerged late last year.
Airplane danger
Politicians and activists have condemned the move, warning that flying the material is excessively dangerous.
The Nuclear Decommissioning Authority (NDA) has remained silent on the issue, but an £18million upgrade of the airport was recently carried out to make it suitable for larger planes.
And, now Highland Council has published a road closure order which reveals minor routes around the airport will be closed over the coming months. The closures could happen at any time from today, and will last up to five hours each time.
A spokeswoman at Dounreay said she could neither confirm nor deny that nuclear waste from the redundant power station would be flown from Wick.
Former Prime Minister David Cameron confirmed earlier this year, after talks with President Obama, that it was the UK’s intention to transport uranium from Dounreay to the South Carolina. It will be swapped for other forms of uranium to be shipped to Europe which, it is believed, will be used in producing medical isotopes.
Caithness, Sutherland and Easter Ross SNP MP Paul Monaghan has described the deal to transport the waste by plane “morally reprehensible”. And Highlands and Islands Green MSP John Finnie last night said many people would be surprised to find out about the road closures – but that the disruption was nothing compared to the risks involved with flying the waste.
“Many will be astonished that it is considered appropriate to move, let alone fly, this waste material from Dounreay,” he said. “The local disruption is nothing compared to the risks any transit poses. This waste should be retained at Dounreay.”
The council’s local area leader Gillian Coghill said: “We were not briefed about this, which is absolutely shocking……….
Independent nuclear consultant John Large raised concerns about the transport of the material. He said if there was an accident it would involve an extremely vulnerable and potentially radiologically significant material. “The radiological consequences of even a relatively small amount of this material would be very serious,” he said.
“In terms of nuclear safety, the International Atomic Energy Agency recognises that the transportation of radioactive materials is the one at most risk and is most prone and vulnerable to terrorist attack.
“The risk in transport by aircraft is the fuel being engulfed in fire, the packages breaking down and the fuel igniting.”
Mr Large added that it was incumbent on Dounreay to provide sufficient information for the public to come to an informed judgement about the move. “It doesn’t matter whether the material is for civil or military stock, it presents the same risk,” he said. https://www.pressandjournal.co.uk/fp/news/highlands/1014760/fury-over-nuclear-flights/
Is this worse than globull warming?
Transatlantic flights with nuclear waste cargo – an unacceptable danger
Posted by Christina MacPherson
“Nuclear waste should be dealt with as close to where it is produced as possible rather than risking transporting it in ships or planes. This waste will remain dangerous for tens of thousands of years. The consequences of an accident during transit would be horrific.”
the proposed shipment sent an “open invitation to terrorists keen to get their hands on this prime terrorist material”.
Airplane danger
Campaigners condemn UK Government for playing transatlantic nuclear ping-pong,
Herald Scotland, MICHAEL SETTLE, 31 Mar 16 CAMPAIGNERS have denounced the UK Government’s decision to play “transatlantic nuclear ping-pong” by agreeing a deal to transport 700 kilograms of weapons-grade uranium fuel from Dounreay in Caithness to the US.
The SNP’s Paul Monaghan, the local MP, said he too was deeply concerned by the development and is to demand assurances from David Cameron about the safety of the transportation, which he believes will involve up to nine flights from Wick airport using huge American c-130 Galaxy aircraft.
“Wick airport is not built for that kind of aircraft. I’m very concerned about the prospect of the planes flying over the town,” declared the backbencher.
Mr Monaghan stressed that the highly-enriched uranium fuel, which he said had originated from the former soviet state of Georgia, could only be used for nuclear weapons.
Claiming the Prime Minister had “obfuscated” in his replies when asked previously about the planned shipment of nuclear fuel from Dounreay to the US, the Nationalist MP said the safety of local people was his “paramount concern” and that the UK Government, through its lack of clarity, was “abrogating its responsibility to the people of Scotland”.
Mr Cameron is due formally to announce the deal when he attends an international nuclear security summit in Washington DC tomorrow. It will involve the largest ever shipment of radioactive material from the UK to America, which in turn will send a different form of the nuclear element to Euratom, the European atomic agency, for conversion in France into medical isotopes to be used in European hospitals for the diagnosis and treatment of cancer.
A UK Government source said: “It’s a win-win; we get rid of waste and we get back something that will help us to fight cancer.”
But Richard Dixon, director of Friends of the Earth Scotland, said: “Only the nuclear industry could think it was a good idea to risk playing ping pong with large quantities of one of the most dangerous materials on the planet across the Atlantic.
“Europe is littered with plenty of highly radioactive waste from both reactors and weapons, there cannot possibly be a need to be importing any more from the US, nor for us to be sending ours to them.”
He added: “Nuclear waste should be dealt with as close to where it is produced as possible rather than risking transporting it in ships or planes. This waste will remain dangerous for tens of thousands of years. The consequences of an accident during transit would be horrific.”
John Finnie, justice spokesman for the Scottish Greens, dismissed the UK Government’s attempt to present the proposal to send dangerous nuclear waste across the Atlantic as helping in the fight against cancer as “at best misleading and at worst cynical”.
He added: “Moving such a large amount of toxic waste shows callous disregard for the safety of people in the Highlands. There must be better ways to fight cancer than sending dangerous uranium on an 11,000 kilometre round trip.”
Whitehall has, for security reasons, not confirmed the details of the transportation or the timescale.
Last year, the Sunday Herald broke the story about a “secret plan” to ship nuclear material from Dounreay to America.
The report said the plan was for nearly five kilograms of enriched uranium to be transported by sea from Caithness to the US Government’s nuclear complex at Savannah River in South Carolina.
The material was said to have come from a research institute in Mtskheta, some six miles from the Georgian capital, Tbilisi, in a secretive US operation codenamed Auburn Endeavour in April 1998. Washington was said to have been worried at the time that it could have fallen into the hands of Chechen gangs or Iran.
However, the proposed UK Government plan is to ship not five kilograms but 700kg or more than 110 stones of the nuclear material.
At the time of “secret plan” report one anti-nuclear campaigner warned the proposed shipment sent an “open invitation to terrorists keen to get their hands on this prime terrorist material”……..http://www.heraldscotland.com/news/14395623.Campaigners_condemn_UK_Government_for_playing_transatlantic_nuclear_ping_pong/
What could go wrong?...
Flying nuclear material from Scotland to US ‘an option’ - BBC News
http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-scotland-highlands-islands-36072023
Scotland
Highlands & Islands
Flying nuclear material from Scotland to US ‘an option’
18 April 2016
From the section Highlands & Islands
Image copyright Thinkstock
Image caption It has been proposed that highly enriched uranium stored at Dounreay be transported to the US
The Nuclear Decommissioning Authority (NDA) has said radioactive material could potentially be flown to and from Scotland and the US.
Last month, the UK and US governments agreed that material could be exchanged, with the UK receiving a type of uranium used to diagnose cancer.
The NDA is funding improvement work to enhance the runway at Wick John O’Groats Airport.
The airport is about 30 miles (48km) from the Dounreay nuclear site.
Under the UK-US deal, it has been proposed that highly enriched uranium (HEU) stored at Dounreay be sent to the US.
The NDA said flying the material was among options being considered, but also said no decisions have been taken.
‘Larger aircraft’
A spokeswoman for the NDA said: “The protection of the public and personnel is of paramount importance at all times. For those reason we are unable to disclose information about the transport arrangement that’s could jeopardise the security of this material.
“It has been proposed that a quantity of HEU may be exchanged with the US in return for material to be used in the production of medical isotopes for Europe.
“The upgrades to the airport in Wick will be done to ensure that this is one possible option to allow the transport to take place.”
A spokesman for Wick John O’Groats Airport, which is operated by Highlands and Islands Airport Limited, said: “Work will get under way later this month on a project to refurbish the runway at Wick John O’Groats Airport in order to enhance its operational capability and, in particular, its ability to accommodate larger aircraft.
“This work will be carried out on behalf of the Nuclear Decommissioning Authority. The majority of work will be carried out overnight and the project is expected to be completed in August.”
Image caption Fuel from Dounreay is being transported to Sellafield in Cumbria by rail
Radioactive material from the civil nuclear industry has been transported by plane in the past, the NDA said.
A spokesman for the authority added that funding improvements to the airport near Wick secured “the option of moving material by air on a range of aircraft”.
The Dounreay nuclear power complex is being decommissioned and the site cleaned up.
Most of the radioactive materials, such as fuel, held there is being moved to other locations, including Sellafield in Cumbria where it will be reprocessed or stored.
These shipments are being made by rail.
Image caption The cargo ship MV Parida got into difficulty while transporting waste from Dounreay to Belgium
Over a period of four years, 150 tonnes of waste held at Dounreay were transported in 21 shipments to Belgium by sea.
In October 2014, a fire broke out on a ship involved in this work and it began drifting in the Outer Moray Firth.
The MV Parida was transporting a cargo of cemented radioactive waste when a fire broke out in a funnel.
The blaze was extinguished, but 52 workers were taken from the nearby Beatrice oil platform by helicopter as a precaution.
The cargo ship was towed to Invergordon for repairs before completing its journey to Antwerp.
The NDA said at the time that the ship and its cargo had been categorised at the lowest level of safety concern.
Or crash on take-off or landing where most flight event catastrophes occur.
Shipping by Naval escort ship sea and then military convoy to processing centers would seem to be the more prudent course to take.
RE: “What could go wrong?...
They could crash in the ocean?” <— Foolishly myopic
Excellent article.
Reprocessing or long term storage of weapons grade nuclear waste is one thing.
Flying Tons of it in and out near population centers, instead of shipping by naval vessel escort, is reckless unnecessary risk.
Over half of the UK’s nuclear weapons tests were on US soil. The two countries have been cooperating for a long time.
And where will this nuclear waste be stored? Yucca Mountain (no, thanks to Harry Reid).
Will it be re-processed? (no, thanks to Jimmy Carter)
Are we obligated to store it (yes, thanks to some treaty we signed somewhere along the way)
American rate payers (that’s everyone who pays an electric, or gas, bill have paid for the Yucca Mountain facility and we are not allowed to use it, leaving tons of nuclear waste stored in the open air in unsecured facilities, which I shall not mention.
The State of Nevada happily took the money we all paid and the jobs to build Yucca Mountain and then shut down access, leaving our mining machinery to rot at the bottom of a deep hole and the American people vulnerable to whatever dangers may ensue.
It’s a disgrace and the American people should be up in arms about it. Let’s hear the candidates defend those decisions!
Flying Tons of weapons grade nuclear waste in and out near population centers, instead of shipping by naval vessel escort, is reckless unnecessary risk.
Excellent questions that bear repeating -
RE: And where will this nuclear waste be stored? Yucca Mountain (no, thanks to Harry Reid).
Will it be re-processed? (no, thanks to Jimmy Carter)
Are we obligated to store it (yes, thanks to some treaty we signed somewhere along the way)
American rate payers (that’s everyone who pays an electric, or gas, bill have paid for the Yucca Mountain facility and we are not allowed to use it, leaving tons of nuclear waste stored in the open air in unsecured facilities, which I shall not mention.
The State of Nevada happily took the money we all paid and the jobs to build Yucca Mountain and then shut down access, leaving our mining machinery to rot at the bottom of a deep hole and the American people vulnerable to whatever dangers may ensue.
It’s a disgrace and the American people should be up in arms about it. Let’s hear the candidates defend those decisions!
Of course my dear departed Dad, who used to work at a gaseous diffusion facility, used to say Americans should be scared to death of what is shipped by truck and rail in the US.
PING!!
Confirmed that THE FIRST shipment of Highly Enriched Uranium Weapons grade nuclear waste (700 Kg) has shipped from Scotland’s Wick Airport to the US.
Has the US media informed us about this? Only saw this in UK news (as expected)
Does everyone know this 18 month duration nuke waste transfer deal the UK recently made with the US?
Flying 800 kg of weapons grade uranium waste to the US - What could go wrong?...
Article and ALL comments
Thanks, MarchonDC09122009
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.