Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Intel finally narrows their 14nm process technology gap to Samsung (Who Knew????)
semiaccurate.com ^ | Sep 1, 2016 | Charlie Demerjian

Posted on 09/02/2016 12:44:02 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach

Less than a year late but half as good as the Korean giant

It looks like Intel’s process technology has finally narrowed the gap to Samsung, it is now less than a year. SemiAccurate thinks this is a bit of a misleading number though, if you look at the tech, Samsung’s process is still better.

With the innovation in Intel’s Kaby Lake 7th Generation Core CPU line, the process improvements Intel brought to bear have been lost in the buzz. This is unfair because according to the presentations provided by Intel, they have finally narrowed the timing gap to industry leader Samsung on process technology. Timing isn’t the only important part of a process though, the technology matters too and Intel has a lot more work to do there if they want to catch Samsung.

Intel 2nd generation 14nm process slide

Slideware can hide performance gaps

Intel provided the data in their Kaby Lake briefing to show how much they narrowed the timing gap to Samsung. Intel released their second generation 14nm FinFET process called 14nm+ this week, Samsung released theirs on January 14, 2016. While SemiAccurate may be exaggerating a bit by calling this gap 3Q, 8.5 months is still less than a year. As long as Intel’s release is to be taken at face value like they want it to be, the progress they made is still remarkable.

(Excerpt) Read more at semiaccurate.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Computers/Internet
KEYWORDS: hitech

1 posted on 09/02/2016 12:44:02 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ShadowAce; SunkenCiv

fyi


2 posted on 09/02/2016 12:46:42 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

With or to? Or is there no difference?


3 posted on 09/02/2016 12:47:47 PM PDT by dp0622 (The only thing an upper crust conservative hates more than a liberal is a middle class conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

What is Samsung’s Technology used in?

Smartphones? Tablets?

I thought AMD and Intel were the only manufacturer of processors.


4 posted on 09/02/2016 12:58:26 PM PDT by tennmountainman ("Prophet Mountainman" Predicter Of All Things RINO...for a small pittance)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tennmountainman
Ever heard of ARM , TSMC, Qualcomm, Nvidia??

And Apple...They do their own design,..

5 posted on 09/02/2016 1:05:23 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

http://www.eetimes.com/author.asp?section_id=36&doc_id=1330366&;


6 posted on 09/02/2016 1:09:04 PM PDT by Pelham (Best.Election.Ever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pelham
Thanks for the Link....

There is also a July 2015 aericle from EE imes about IBM and a SUNY Team doing a working chip at 7 nm with new Materials ....will be searching for that,...amazing stufff going on!

7 posted on 09/02/2016 1:17:47 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

https://semiaccurate.com/2016/08/31/amd-goes-7nm-new-global-foundries-agreement/


8 posted on 09/02/2016 1:22:35 PM PDT by Pelham (Best.Election.Ever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Samsung funds research for 7nm
9 posted on 09/02/2016 1:35:48 PM PDT by blam (Jeff Sessions For President)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

Remember 20-odd years ago feature sizes under 1000nm were considered impressive?


10 posted on 09/02/2016 1:38:19 PM PDT by DuncanWaring (The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: DuncanWaring
"Remember 20-odd years ago feature sizes under 1000nm were considered impressive?"

Yup.

I'm a retired chip-maker, 1994.

We were running 1.5 microns (1500nm) in production and beginning to run 1.0 micron feature sizes in production. And, experimenting with 0.5 micron sizes.

11 posted on 09/02/2016 1:53:47 PM PDT by blam (Jeff Sessions For President)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: blam

I figured you’d know.


12 posted on 09/02/2016 2:06:05 PM PDT by DuncanWaring (The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: blam; DuncanWaring; SunkenCiv; ShadowAce
Was just over reading this:

AMD Has Plans To Create The ‘Starship’ Processor With 48 Cores / 96 Threads On The 7nm Node

Also has an imbedded link to the EE Times article regarding the 7 nm chip by IBM and SUNY Research Lab.

13 posted on 09/02/2016 5:04:13 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: All
I think this relates:

High-speed GaAs/AlGaAs optoelectronic devices for computer applications

14 posted on 09/02/2016 5:39:02 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: All
And:

Intel Abandoning Silicon With 7nm and Beyond – Silicon Alternatives Coming By 2020

2 years ago by Khalid Moammer

********************************************EXCERPT************************************************

Intel revealed that the end of the road for Silicon is nearing as alternative materials will be required for the 7nm node and beyond. This is perhaps one of the more interesting stories that came out of this year’s international solid state conference.

Intel Process RoadmapIt has been well known that Silicon is running out of steam but it was previously believed that Silicon would make it at least to 7nm. Intel however believes that Silicon alternatives will be required for the 7nm process and beyond.

Intel Abandoning Silicon With 7nm and Beyond – Silicon Alternatives Coming By 2020

Moore’s law which is the observation that transistor density doubles every year, later amended to every couple of years, has slowed down dramatically in the past few years. Scaling Silicon transistors down has become increasingly difficult and expensive and at around 7nm it will prove to be downright impossible.

Digital computing which is what the entire world has relied on for the past several decades is based on one basic concept, on or off. The zeroes and ones in binary simply indicate if a signal is present or not. The fundamental flaw with Silicon transistors is that at the 7nm point the transistors sit so close to each other that an effect called quantum tunneling occurs. This effect unfortunately means that the transistor cannot reliably be turned off and for the most part will stay on.

15 posted on 09/02/2016 5:54:59 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson