Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Liberals and secularists are all closet eugenics fans. The "Progressives" in America were open about it in the early 20th century when they celebrated Lenin and Mussolini. Their ideological cousin Hitler discredited the practice, much to their regret.

Planned Parenthood was founded to eliminate all sorts of "undesirables." - Now, Soros funds the most evil activist organizations and both prospers and advances his "open societies" global governance agenda by destroying national currencies. His push in Ireland is about abortion and distancing it's people from God. The end is to obtain total control of the human species and have it worship the state. Because "when people have the freedom to choose they choose wrong." Soros is evil - an instrument of the dark forces waging spiritual war on Earth. He is Hillary Clinton's largest donor for a reason.

1 posted on 08/28/2016 5:43:59 PM PDT by Beave Meister
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Beave Meister
Soros and his fellow travelers support abortion everywhere except in the Moslem world.
2 posted on 08/28/2016 5:48:02 PM PDT by Mr. Mojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Beave Meister

“[Soros] is Hillary Clinton’s largest donor for a reason.”

Ghouls. Every. Last. One. Of. Them.

*SPIT*


3 posted on 08/28/2016 5:50:17 PM PDT by Diana in Wisconsin (I don't have 'Hobbies.' I'm developing a robust Post-Apocalyptic skill set...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All
Because?

.

.

.

.

.

.

Sorry, I shouldn't joke about this evil stuff, and it IS evil.

4 posted on 08/28/2016 5:53:48 PM PDT by LegendHasIt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Beave Meister

The same reason they push immortality and licentiousness here: they think if people accept it they will eventually approve of it and when that happens aver home is accepted and they’ll get into heaven on a wave, escaping judgement. They’re a big bunch of thirteen year olds but with money. And they’ve given in to their master. They’re doing its work, attempting to convert us

Ireland is a great coup for the enemy. Until only a few years ago, it felt like a holy place. Some person a mere human in political came in and pushed for legal abortion which always starts with acceptance of birth control. Always. Then that’s it. Hell breaks loose. And it’s exported by our progressives in the US (bill gates and his so called Catholic wife for one who’ve been exporting birth control to African nations for LI these many years) who have too much money and zero appreciation for where it comes from


5 posted on 08/28/2016 5:55:09 PM PDT by stanne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Beave Meister

It doesn’t make sense. The excuse used concerning the influx of refugees, is that the populations of Western Nations is in decline…..so why then propose and push abortion in Ireland? and then replace them with muslim refugees who have large families?

I think you are exactly right when you wrote: “Soros is evil - an instrument of the dark forces waging spiritual war on Earth.”


6 posted on 08/28/2016 5:56:37 PM PDT by xenia ("In times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act." George Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Beave Meister

The most powerful and wealthy people in the world all agree on eugenics.


7 posted on 08/28/2016 5:57:15 PM PDT by montag813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Beave Meister

I wonder if Soros is one of Satan’s minions on earth. I am serious.


8 posted on 08/28/2016 5:57:57 PM PDT by yarddog (Romans 8:38-39, For I am persuaded.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Beave Meister
It's Soros, but it's not just Soros. Mega-rich people in general are relentless global abortion enthusiasts. The big funders of baby-killing worldwide are the private individuals and their foundations who represent the 1% of the 1%, the wealthiest people on earth.

They seem to be so suave, so self-satisfied, so temperate in their personal habits, so socially connected, so nicely dressed and well-coiffed, so demon-infested.

10 posted on 08/28/2016 6:07:45 PM PDT by Mrs. Don-o (Pray for the *%$#s. It's the only way to help them, or you, become a bit worthier as a human being.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Beave Meister

Consistent with the NWO goons’ primary objective of eradicating the white man. You don’t get much more white, with natural red hair and freckles, that the Irish.


13 posted on 08/28/2016 6:09:04 PM PDT by Paulie (America without Christ is like a Chemistry book without the periodic table.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Beave Meister
There is an oft-overlooked imperative for the Democrat Party's hard, unbending stand on abortion, as declared in the first paragraph of a late-1800's analysis of "The Impracticability of Socialism." In that paragraph, the writer's point seems to be that under Socialism, ordinary human population growth cannot be economically supported.
The following is quoted from the Liberty Fund Library "A Plea for Liberty: An Argument Against Socialism and Socialistic Legislation," edited by Thomas Mackay (1849 - 1912), Chapter 1, final paragraphs from Edward Stanley Robertson's essay, "The Impracticability of Socialism":

Note the writer's emphasis that the "scheme of Socialism" requires what he calls "the power of restraining the increase in population"--long the essential and primary focus of the Democrat Party in the U. S.:

"I have suggested that the scheme of Socialism is wholly incomplete unless it includes a power of restraining the increase of population, which power is so unwelcome to Englishmen that the very mention of it seems to require an apology. I have showed that in France, where restraints on multiplication have been adopted into the popular code of morals, there is discontent on the one hand at the slow rate of increase, while on the other, there is still a 'proletariat,' and Socialism is still a power in politics.
I.44
"I have put the question, how Socialism would treat the residuum of the working class and of all classes—the class, not specially vicious, nor even necessarily idle, but below the average in power of will and in steadiness of purpose. I have intimated that such persons, if they belong to the upper or middle classes, are kept straight by the fear of falling out of class, and in the working class by positive fear of want. But since Socialism purposes to eliminate the fear of want, and since under Socialism the hierarchy of classes will either not exist at all or be wholly transformed, there remains for such persons no motive at all except physical coercion. Are we to imprison or flog all the 'ne'er-do-wells'?
I.45
"I began this paper by pointing out that there are inequalities and anomalies in the material world, some of which, like the obliquity of the ecliptic and the consequent inequality of the day's length, cannot be redressed at all. Others, like the caprices of sunshine and rainfall in different climates, can be mitigated, but must on the whole be endured. I am very far from asserting that the inequalities and anomalies of human society are strictly parallel with those of material nature. I fully admit that we are under an obligation to control nature so far as we can. But I think I have shown that the Socialist scheme cannot be relied upon to control nature, because it refuses to obey her. Socialism attempts to vanquish nature by a front attack. Individualism, on the contrary, is the recognition, in social politics, that nature has a beneficent as well as a malignant side. . . .
I.46
"Freedom is the most valuable of all human possessions, next after life itself. It is more valuable, in a manner, than even health. No human agency can secure health; but good laws, justly administered, can and do secure freedom. Freedom, indeed, is almost the only thing that law can secure. Law cannot secure equality, nor can it secure prosperity. In the direction of equality, all that law can do is to secure fair play, which is equality of rights but is not equality of conditions. In the direction of prosperity, all that law can do is to keep the road open. That is the Quintessence of Individualism, and it may fairly challenge comparison with that Quintessence of Socialism we have been discussing. Socialism, disguise it how we may, is the negation of Freedom. That it is so, and that it is also a scheme not capable of producing even material comfort in exchange for the abnegations of Freedom, I think the foregoing considerations amply prove."
EDWARD STANLEY ROBERTSON
With Hillary, isn't this the choice we must make--a path to tyranny or a possible path back to freedom in America?

17 posted on 08/28/2016 7:03:56 PM PDT by loveliberty2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson