First continuously variable transmission, now continuously variable compression...
Geez, that diagram in the article screams of mechanical over complication of a much easier solution considering today’s availability of technology.
I had worked on an engine a guy developed that used one valve per cylinder. Could run any fuel and its valves were controlled by a solenoid whose actuation was not off and on but of a variable drive and not connected mechanically to a camshaft. All the camshaft was used for was pulse timing for sensors. This thing could do the Cadillac 4-6-8 thing based on torque demand coupled to speed and it had the capability to have those cylinders not compress at all if they were determined to be “off” by the injection and ignition computer. Of course I am leaving something out.
No fuel delivery and no compression meant less power loss and fuel savings, as designed for highway cruising and lots of power for stump pulling.
Complicated electronics but only in the software to manage the whole thing.