Skip to comments.
Woman wearing niqab thrown out: Muslim woman booted from Family Dollar store by manager
https://youtu.be/LsM5kyOkVUg ^
Posted on 08/04/2016 10:56:31 PM PDT by KMG365
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-71 last
To: Ann Archy
FWIW:
"Traditional nun" image search. In even the most extreme example I could find there, all the identifying facial features are exposed.
61
posted on
08/05/2016 6:09:25 AM PDT
by
NorthMountain
(Hillary Clinton: corrupt unreliable negligent traitor)
To: KMG365
"Woman wearing niqab..."How about writing in English, reporter? "Woman wearing Islamic face veil..."
62
posted on
08/05/2016 6:25:03 AM PDT
by
Albion Wilde
(We will no longer surrender this country to the false song of globalism. --Donald Trump)
To: KMG365
How about the oposite of a nutjib and that is going in naked?
63
posted on
08/05/2016 6:39:56 AM PDT
by
Leep
(Cut the crap!)
To: KMG365
Very quick with the recording there...it’s almost as if...it was planned that way!
64
posted on
08/05/2016 7:36:09 AM PDT
by
Moltke
(Reasoning with a liberal is like watering a rock in the hope to grow a building)
To: KMG365
65
posted on
08/05/2016 7:44:42 AM PDT
by
rrrod
(just an old guy with a gun in his pocket.l)
To: hey Bean
That’s even BETTER!!! NO MASKS NO BURKAS!!
66
posted on
08/05/2016 8:54:13 AM PDT
by
Ann Archy
(Abortion....... The HUMAN Sacrifice to the god of Convenience.)
To: FrdmLvr
i guess stealing isn’t against their religion
67
posted on
08/05/2016 9:43:34 AM PDT
by
dp0622
(The only thing an upper crust conservative hates more than a liberal is a middle class conservative)
To: Amendment10
>
More specifically, the Supreme Court clarified in United States v. Cruikshank that the states required only the feds and the states, not individual citizens, to respect the personal rights which the states have amended the Constitution to expressly protect.
>
Come now. We all KNOW nothing older than ~1910, let alone the Constitution itself, is ever used as a basis for Judicial rulings....it’s all precedent\’case law’.
Next you’ll be telling us the Voting Rights Act is void on 9th/10th A. grounds and biz, such as this, are have the power, nay RIGHT, to prohibit anyone access of ‘public accommodations’!
68
posted on
08/05/2016 10:08:15 AM PDT
by
i_robot73
("A man chooses. A slave obeys." - Andrew Ryan)
To: Ann Archy
>
Other than Thieves, Rioters, Protestors and Muslims, who would ever cover up their faces?
>
S.W.A.T.\militarized police? I may have repeated myself from your original post, so excuse me if so.
69
posted on
08/05/2016 10:10:13 AM PDT
by
i_robot73
("A man chooses. A slave obeys." - Andrew Ryan)
To: Sirius Lee
*If* that was beer [how can anyone tell] I thought alcohol was forbidden by their religion.
70
posted on
08/05/2016 5:38:55 PM PDT
by
Daffynition
(*Russia, if you are listening* ..... proof the left has *NO* sense of humor.)
To: Ann Archy
71
posted on
08/06/2016 2:28:18 AM PDT
by
R. Scott
(Humanity i love you because when you're hard up you pawn your Intelligence to buy a drink)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-71 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson