I never understand the way we push Gardisil on teenage girls.
The cervical cancer danger is in girls who are promiscuous.
While some may be, most girls are not having sex with multiple partners, and in any case, we should not have policies which endorse or encourage such behavior.
Anyone know what the risk of cervical cancer is, either as young women, or for them later in life? As with anything else, you have to weigh the risk of the disease with the risk of the vaccine.
Was that girl who died inviting boy after boy into her bedroom, to do God knows what, which would put her at high risk???
Some hard questions should be asked about what we are doing in this area, in my opinion.
“The cervical cancer danger is in girls who are promiscuous.”
Idiot. A perfect Christian girl who never does more than kiss a boy before marriage can get it. A girls who’s first kiss is on her wedding day can get it if her less than pure husband pollinates that flower with something he caught long before he met her.
Hard questions need to be asked about your ignorance.
**The cervical cancer danger is in girls who are promiscuous.**
Wrong.
I had to tell a lady, who was a virgin until she got married, the she had HPV. She got it from her husband, who had x number of sexual encounters before meeting her.
See my post. You can get cervical cancer from your husband. Cervical cancer is different from other STDs, in that it is very easy for men to catch the virus, but there's nothing to tell them they have it, and no reason for them to worry about it. There are “good girls” who die of cervical cancer.
“in any case, we should not have policies which endorse or encourage such behavior”
How are vaccines encouraging the behavior?
I mean, I got tetanus shots but I was never tempted to step on rusty nails...
“I never understand the way we push Gardisil on teenage girls.
The cervical cancer danger is in girls who are promiscuous.....”
I think the reasoning is get them young before they are sexually active. Like when they go to college.