Posted on 08/02/2016 6:04:24 AM PDT by heterosupremacist
Are the Saudis trying to make sure that the candidate of their choice is elected President of the United States this November?
Khizr Khan is more than just the father of slain Muslim U.S. serviceman Humayun Khan and the mainstream media’s flavor of the moment in its ongoing efforts to demonize and destroy Donald Trump. As far as the Obama administration and Hillary campaign are concerned, he is a living validation of the success of their strategy against “extremism”: by refusing to identify the enemy as having anything to do with Islam, they draw moderate Muslims to their side and move them to fight against terrorism. By contrast, Trump, in their view, alienates these moderates and drives them into the arms of the terrorists.
That all sounds great. There’s just one catch: Khizr Khan, and the Clinton campaign, have extensive ties to the Saudis – far more extensive than any possible connection that Donald Trump’s campaign may have had to Russia’s alleged involvement in the leak of emails that revealed that the entire Democratic Party presidential nominating process was rigged from the start. Not that the mainstream media will pause from speculating about Trump and the Russians long enough to tell you any facts about Khizr Khan, Hillary and the Saudis.
Intelius records that Khizr Khan has worked at Hogan Lovells Llp. According to the Washington Free Beacon, “Hogan Lovells LLP, another U.S. firm hired by the Saudis, is registered to work for the Royal Embassy of Saudi Arabia through 2016, disclosures show. Robert Kyle, a lobbyist from the firm, has bundled $50,850 for Clinton’s campaign.”
The Free Beacon added that the Saudi government has “supplied the Clinton Foundation with millions. The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia has given between $10 and $25 million to the foundation while Friends of Saudi Arabia has contributed between $1 and $5 million.”
And so we were treated to the spectacle of an employee of a firm that is registered to work for the Royal Embassy of Saudi Arabia lambasting Donald Trump at the Democratic National Convention, and then (lo and behold!) becoming a media darling as he excoriates Trump for his “black soul.”
Might the government of Saudi Arabia, which has spent countless bullions of dollars spreading the virulent and violent Wahhabi strain of Islam around the world, have any interest in making sure that a presidential candidate who speaks more forthrightly about the Islamic terror threat than any presidential candidate has since John Quincy Adams, and who has vowed to take concrete steps to counter that threat, is defeated? Is that why Khizr Khan, brimming with self-righteous indignation and misleading disinformation about the relationship of Islamic jihad terrorism to Islam, was not only featured at the Democratic National Convention but has dominated the news cycle ever since?
This has gone on long enough. The 28-page section of the 9/11 report detailing Saudi involvement in the September 11, 2001 jihad attacks were just finally released (albeit with substantial portions still redacted), after being kept classified for fifteen years by one President who held hands with the Saudi King and another who bowed to him. And for fifteen years, the U.S. has done little or nothing to free itself from dependence upon Saudi oil and develop alternative energy sources. Why not? We know the Saudis have kept the Clintons’ palms abundantly greased. Who else’s?
The big story of foreign influence in this presidential election is not some vague imaginings about the Russians supposedly hacking Democratic National Committee emails showing the Democrats engaged in indisputably unethical behavior. The real foreign influence story in this election involves the Saudis and the Democrats. Saudi influence in Washington must end. Khizr Khan represents an all-out effort by the mainstream media and the Democratic Party establishment to maintain that influence. In light of that, Donald Trump was right to answer his attacks, and should have been even stronger in his responses. It’s time for the United States of America to regain its independence.
“The first thing we do, is kill all the journalists.”
- Freddy Shakespeare
This is a completely manufactured news cycle. Trump isn’t “backing down” because there’s nothing to back down from. This is standard corrupt press: take what you said, change it, and attack you for what you didn’t way. It’s such a non-starter.
If Trump does intend to “punch through” the press then he cannot cede this ground or they will define every cycle, and trot out lie after fabrication after canard from now to November.
The Saudis are just trying to hedge their Clinton investment...
I read yesterday that Grand Mufti Khan now wants out of the limelight.
Reminds me of something I’ve heard before...something about roaches scurrying when the lights are turned on...?
Loretta Lynch also worked at Hogan - 2002-2010.
“New York tax attorney Howard Topaz, Clintons’ personal tax lawyer,
is a partner at Hogan & Hartson.
Soldiers were in a position where they would get killed, lining them up ...
Hacked Emails: Obama and Clinton Armed ISIS, in Syria
Wikileaks: Hillary Clinton Knew Weapons Supplied to al Qaeda 
How it will be covered up (after HSBC payments to FB”I” and DO”J”):
It’s time for the United States of America to regain its independence.
************
Going to be hard to convince the sheeple of that. Most have become accustomed to dependence as we are largely a nation of Takers now. The spirit of independence and self reliance seems to have largely disappeared. The sheeple vote mostly on the basis of what government promises to give them.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
