Not to state the obvious and the guy is obviously a hack with an agenda, but Trump should not have even replied and it would be a non-issue.
How many times have people said “Trump shouldn’t have replied to {fill in the blank}”
If he’d listened to them, we’d probably be talking about Jeb vs Hillary instead.
This Khan is a Left wing Lawyer and worked with Clinton Foundation. .He worked at a far left Dem party Clinton run law firm .
This hit was planned no matter what Trump said.
The Clinton media know this guy is a Clinton hack and were planning to use him no matter what. It's so obvious whose the paid stooge was .
What Trump said in no way could be construed as a negative comment by this latest Clinton paid operative. He said nothing derogatory about the slain soldier or the Clinton operative daddy. There’s going to be some major blow-back if they don’t get the SOB off the screen and I mean soon. All day if you turn to CNN he’s either badmouthing Trump or their dimwitted panel is doing the same thing. I’ve never seen the beat of it. Trump must have them scared to death. Their battle axe lying crony Clinton the bitch from hell might lose the election and they’re having a melt-down and throwing everything but the kitchen sink at Trump, in the form of a Muslim paid operative who’s missing a few brain cells. All he’s going is repeating words that have been fed to him by Tapper, Lemon or another one of the CNN cronies.
There was no way for Trump to avoid a direct question from a reporter (Clinton hack Stephanopoulos? I didn't see the interview). This will likely come up in the debates too. I do think Trump should have simply reiterated his message about the threats the US faces, and the insanity of importing Muslim "refugees."