Posted on 07/14/2016 1:26:03 PM PDT by NewHampshireDuo
The petitioners have done a lot of background work including examination of financial records, policy changes made without consultation of the membership, sudden revocations of appointments without explanation, spending oddities, etc. The Ames case is a good example as the available documentation completely refutes the ARRL position.
That said, the petition only requests that proceedings be done in an open manner.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.