Posted on 07/11/2016 6:55:30 PM PDT by Randy Larsen
How much will we pay?
How is it possible to have a firearm without ammunition?
News says $20. I believe that may be each Time? Obviously the Idea is to set up the system so you can be stopped from buying your ammo. There’s no other explanation or excuse. Expecting an honest judge can still be found to toss these ridiculous new regs out?
It’s not the amount, it’s to get you in the data base.
reloading?
You’ll pay a lot when they know just where to come to confiscate your ammunition and the money goes up in smoke, if you’ll forgive the pun.
You have a lot more faith in the system than I do, I hope you are correct.
That is one of their goals. How long do you think Wal-Mart will put up with the hassle? I visit my dad in Nevada several times per year.
Can you still get it shipped from out of state vendors?
I’ll continue to get what I need across the boarder. Others may not have that option.
I hope they saved some for the rainy days coming soon.
That is the unknown factor. We must give it a try.
I actually don’t have faith in the judiciary nowadays. But hope, at least, springs eternal.
We shouldn’t even be discussing the possibility of allowing this to happen. This is complete BS. If you allow it to pass, you deserve to have your guns taken away for being too dimwitted to see where this is headed.
That or visit other states and stock up.
I assume you’re talking about California, even if you neglected to say so. I don’t have much sympathy for anybody who lives there.
Buy on line NOW! No sales tax. Freight is a little costly.
The answer is to reload. Two guys buy a Dillon to start off with then away you go.
Nobody asked for your “sympathy”! Stuff it!
Whoa, better call the Waaambulance before you get a nosebleed, little girl.
I don’t wish any ill on your FRiend, but I understand where he is coming from. At some point people need to vote with their feet although I know that is easier said than done for most of us.
I too am in a progressive wonderland although it is not as bad as California (yet). There are plenty of good conservatives in that state, but their votes won’t amount to a hill of beans because the big cities control the day. Having city slickers voting for policy that affects farmers and rural folks is downright aggravating. Take the wolves for example - they sit in their condo in a concrete jungle and vote to unleash pack predators onto my property never worrying about the consequences.
That would have to be passed by Congress. It won’t be.
It's amazing that you are so quick to casually crap on other conservatives simply because they live in a state that is being run roughshod over by corrupt, lawless, leftwing ideologues.
Yup you hit it. Voting with my feet right now for the next couple of years is out of the question. We’ve gotten along real well working around the liberal laws. The current broadside is in some cases 2 years out. One inventor has already come out with a product to bypass the “no bullet button” law. Where there’s a will there’s a way!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.