Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

HILLARY CLINTON IS LEGALLY “DISQUALIFIED FROM HOLDING ANY OFFICE UNDER THE UNITED STATES”
Daily Magazine ^ | 7/8/16

Posted on 07/08/2016 4:19:40 PM PDT by DBCJR

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-23 last
To: DBCJR

DBCJR, the magazine seems to have gotten close, but cited the wrong law. Comey appears to have ignored the law, 18 USC 193 Subsection F, which applies to government officials and defense related documents. Comey admits that there were some classified documents found among those transmitted through Hillary’s server, and there is no intent required for her conviction. In fact “intent” is nowhere included in the law, rather like manslaughter does not require proof of intent. Having responsibility for sensitive and defense-related documents which are exposed, accidently or not, guarantees conviction of any official satisfying the criteria, criteria which Comey himself admits pertains to Hillary. Comey lied and counts on our ignorance, along with the complicity of people we assume to know the law like Trey Gowdy. Congress could and should impeach Comey. Hillary’s violation of 18 USC 793 makes her explicitly ineligible to hold government offices.

For a refreshingly clear explanation of the case by an experienced prosecutor, though one who doesn’t tolerate liars and fools, listen to “Deconstructing Comey and the FBI”, one of Krisanne Hall’s daily discussions of the law. Don’t be misled by the informal language, Krisanne was a formidable prosecutor, along with Russion Intelligence specialist and biochemist before taking on her public mission to teach the original intent of the Constitution to whomever is really interested. (She does say 18 USC 193, but probably misread her notes. She reads and correctly interprets 18 USC 793 (f)). Her reasoning is impeccable.

http://krisannehall.com/deconstructing-comey/


21 posted on 07/09/2016 12:02:28 AM PDT by Spaulding
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Spaulding

Thank you!


22 posted on 07/09/2016 8:57:48 PM PDT by DBCJR (What would you expect?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Spaulding

Thank you!


23 posted on 07/09/2016 8:58:11 PM PDT by DBCJR (What would you expect?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-23 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson