The FBI has these emails, and has read them.
“Transparency”
Barry’s legacy
for history
Lawlessness abounds!
Corruption in motion media approved as long as it’s a democrat they are on the same team.
This is like a child putting his hand over his eyes and saying “You can’t see me.”
They, the entire justice dept, are filled with crooks, bums, political hacks and the corrupt.
So, bribe them.
The Clinton Crime Family Slush Fund is where ALL the scandals are!!!
Leni
america = bananna republic + soviet pravda combo
run by a muslim jihadi supporting traitor
If the justice department does not press for the very obvious misuse to the point of possible espionage or treason because she was teaching her subordinates how to by-pass the security systems, then they are not doing the job. Maybe its time to sue the government and make sure it hits the papers.
THE MONEY QUOTE--- If you are injured by a government agency, you may be able to sue under the Federal Tort Claims Act. Historically, under the doctrine of sovereign immunity, you were not permitted to sue the king. Sovereign immunity has carried over to modern times in the form of a general rule that you cannot sue the government unless the government says you can. Fortunately, the Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA) allows certain kinds of lawsuits against federal employees who are acting within the scope of their employment. And not doing their job to protect the US from high crimes and misdemeaners is one of them,
If you believe you may have a claim for negligence (careless conduct, or other wrongful or tortious conduct) against a federal agency or employee, you must first determine whether you can sue the federal government under the FTCA. Although the limitations and exceptions are too numerous to review in this article, here are some general guidelines regarding the limitations on FTCA claims:
Only federal employees can be sued under the FTCA, not independent contractors hired by the federal government (unless they are treated like employees).
The negligent or wrongful conduct must have been done within the scope of the defendants employment.
In general, only claims of negligence as opposed to intentional misconduct are allowed (though some claims for intentional misconduct can be brought against certain federal law enforcement officers).
The claim must be based on and permitted by the law of the state in which the misconduct occurred.
Despite these and numerous other limitations on FTCA lawsuits, the federal government still pays out millions of dollars each year to compensate FTCA claims. Maybe it will get someones attention. And Ill bet I can find at least one hundred lawyers and a number of organizations that would like to get a piece of Uncle Sugar. Maybe its time.
If the justice department does not press for the very obvious misuse to the point of possible espionage or treason because she was teaching her subordinates how to by-pass the security systems, then they are not doing the job. Maybe its time to sue the government and make sure it hits the papers.
THE MONEY QUOTE--- If you are injured by a government agency, you may be able to sue under the Federal Tort Claims Act. Historically, under the doctrine of sovereign immunity, you were not permitted to sue the king. Sovereign immunity has carried over to modern times in the form of a general rule that you cannot sue the government unless the government says you can. Fortunately, the Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA) allows certain kinds of lawsuits against federal employees who are acting within the scope of their employment. And not doing their job to protect the US from high crimes and misdemeaners is one of them,
If you believe you may have a claim for negligence (careless conduct, or other wrongful or tortious conduct) against a federal agency or employee, you must first determine whether you can sue the federal government under the FTCA. Although the limitations and exceptions are too numerous to review in this article, here are some general guidelines regarding the limitations on FTCA claims:
Only federal employees can be sued under the FTCA, not independent contractors hired by the federal government (unless they are treated like employees).
The negligent or wrongful conduct must have been done within the scope of the defendants employment.
In general, only claims of negligence as opposed to intentional misconduct are allowed (though some claims for intentional misconduct can be brought against certain federal law enforcement officers).
The claim must be based on and permitted by the law of the state in which the misconduct occurred.
Despite these and numerous other limitations on FTCA lawsuits, the federal government still pays out millions of dollars each year to compensate FTCA claims. Maybe it will get someones attention. And Ill bet I can find at least one hundred lawyers and a number of organizations that would like to get a piece of Uncle Sugar. Maybe its time.
This story is BS